December 28, 2010
An empirical analysis of the counterfactual: a merger and divestiture in the Australian cigarette industry
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Vivienne Pham and David Prentice, La Trobe University describe An empirical analysis of the counterfactual: a merger and divestiture in the Australian cigarette industry.
ABSTRACT: In this paper we empirically analyse two counterfactual situations facing an anti-trust authority following the merger of two of the largest international cigarette companies. First we estimate a nested logit model of demand for cigarettes. The implied elasticity of demand for smoking and implied marginal costs are both broadly consistent with the limited independent estimates available. We then use the model to simulate the proposed merger and the partial divestiture that was accepted by the Australian anti-trust authority. A comparison of the relative price changes predicted by the divestiture simulation with the actual post-divestiture price changes shows the model successfully anticipated the behaviour of the divested brands. This suggests structural econometric analysis using a nested logit may be usefully utilised by anti-trust authorities to assess the welfare implications of proposed mergers and partial divestitures.
December 28, 2010 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference An empirical analysis of the counterfactual: a merger and divestiture in the Australian cigarette industry: