Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

Monday, September 13, 2010

Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for Innovation

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Mark Lemley (Stanford Law) has a short but interesting new paper on Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for Innovation.

ABSTRACT: The premise that IP promotes dynamic efficiency while antitrust concentrates on static welfare is wrong, or at least oversimplified. It proceeds from a fundamentally Schumpeterian assumption that competition will not lead to innovation, and we need the lure of monopoly to drive investment in new products. In fact, however there is substantial economic evidence suggesting that competition itself may act as a greater spur to innovation than monopoly. Critically, different market structures will promote innovation in different industries. Sometimes - as in the pharmaceutical industry - we need the incentive provided by strong patents, but in other industries - like the Internet - competition is more likely to spur innovation. Both patent and antitrust law need to take these industry differences into account. And to do so, antitrust will need to shed its subservience to IP law.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for Innovation:


Post a comment