Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, August 16, 2010

Refusal to Supply and Innovation: Past, Present and Future

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Michael Potter, Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC),  describes Refusal to Supply and Innovation: Past, Present and Future.

ABSTRACT: The effects of competition rules on innovation can be very far reaching and may be seen as a hindrance to one of its foundational aims; increasing consumer welfare. The aim of this discussion is to provide the reader with sufficient background knowledge of unilateral refusal to supply pursuant to Article 102 TFEU. The piecemeal legal principles show the development of this murky area. Having set the scene, it will look at one of the more prominent cases in the area; the Commission decision against Microsoft. Law and economics overlap greatly, especially where competition policy is concerned and this discussion will highlight the ongoing legal and economic debates underlying the Microsoft decision. More recent developments in the area of unilateral refusal to supply will be highlighted followed by a comparative discussion on how this area is tackled in the United States with special emphasis on the Trinko decision.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2010/08/refusal-to-supply-and-innovation-past-present-and-future.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef013485db77d5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Refusal to Supply and Innovation: Past, Present and Future:

Comments

Post a comment