Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

Tacit Collusion in an Infinitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Joseph E. Harrington, Jr. (Johns Hopkins - Econ) and Wei Zhao (Johns Hopkins - Econ)  have an interesting new paper on Tacit Collusion in an Infinitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma.

ABSTRACT: In the context of an infinitely repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma, we explore how cooperation is initiated when players communicate and coordinate through their actions. There are two types of players - patient and impatient - which are private information. An impatient type is incapable of cooperative play, while if both players are patient types - and this is common knowledge - then they can cooperate with a grim trigger strategy. We find that the longer that players have gone without cooperating, the lower is the probability that they’ll cooperate in the next period. While the probability of cooperation emerging is always positive, there is a positive probability that cooperation never occurs.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2010/07/tacit-collusion-in-an-infinitely-repeated-prisoners-dilemma.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0133f1191ca0970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Tacit Collusion in an Infinitely Repeated Prisoners’ Dilemma:

Comments

Post a comment