Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, June 14, 2010

Competition versus Collusion: The Impact of Consumer Inertia

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Bos Iwan (Department of Organization & Strategy, Maastricht University), Peeters Ronald (Department of Economics, Maastricht University), and Pot Erik (Department of Quantitative Economics, Maastricht University) consider Competition versus Collusion: The Impact of Consumer Inertia.

ABSTRACT: We consider a model of dynamic price competition to analyze the impact of consumer inertia on the ability of firms to sustain high prices. Three main consequences are identified, all of which contrast with predictions of the standard model of collusion: (i) maintaining high prices does not require punishment strategies when firms are sufficiently myopic, (ii) if buyers are sufficiently inert, then high prices can be sustained for all discount factors, and (iii) the ability to maintain high prices may depend non-monotonically on the level of the discount factor when the industry exhibits network externalities and demand is sufficiently viscous. These results provide a number of interesting insights with regard to competitive and collusive pricing behavior. In particular, we illustrate how direct communication between firms may facilitate collusion.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2010/06/competition-versus-collusion-the-impact-of-consumer-inertia.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0133ee9b9556970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Competition versus Collusion: The Impact of Consumer Inertia:

Comments

Post a comment