Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Antitrust Forum-Shopping in England: Is Provimi Ltd v Aventis Correct?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Brian Kennelly (Blackstone Chambers) asks Antitrust Forum-Shopping in England: Is Provimi Ltd v Aventis Correct?

ABSTRACT: This article examines the judgment of Aikens J in Provimi Ltd and ors v Aventis Animal Nutrition SA and ors, which opened the door to the stream (if not yet a flood) of non-U.K. claimants bringing competition law damages claims in this jurisdiction. Provimi found that a corporate entity (e.g. a subsidiary) may be liable for implementing a cartel contrary to Article 101(1) TFEU where it is part of the same undertaking as the cartelist, even if it had no knowledge of the cartel and never made sales of the cartelized products to the claimants (ยงยง31, 39-41).

On this basis, and armed with Article 6(1) of the Judgments Regulation,a foreign victim can sue all of the foreign members of the cartel in England provided that there is at least one subsidiary of one of the cartelists in England. Provimi was clearly a welcome decision for U.K. competition litigators. It may, however, be wrong.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2010/06/antitrust-forumshopping-in-england-is-provimi-ltd-v-aventis-correct.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef013482e66187970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Antitrust Forum-Shopping in England: Is Provimi Ltd v Aventis Correct?:

Comments

Post a comment