Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

A More Efficient Use of Efficiencies in Merger Authorisation Determinations

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Arlen Duke, University of Melbourne - Law School writes on A More Efficient Use of Efficiencies in Merger Authorisation Determinations.

ABSTRACT: This article considers the varying treatment of merger-related efficiencies in overseas jurisdictions and in Australian and New Zealand merger authorisation and clearance determinates. This analysis leads to the conclusion that the inclusion of an efficiency defence in the legislative regime that regulates the competitive effects of mergers tends to cause decision-makers to adopt a less sophisticated approach when assessing the competitive effects of merger activity. It is therefore argued that the Australian Competition Tribunal, the body now responsible for determining authorisation applications, should be alert to the fact that the effects of merger-related efficiencies are relevant to both the assessment of public benefits and public detriments. By considering the competition and resource saving effects of merger-related efficiencies separately, the tribunal will be better placed to assess the merger’s effect on competition and perform a more meaningful trade-off between competition and efficiency as part of its analysis of merger authorisation applications.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A More Efficient Use of Efficiencies in Merger Authorisation Determinations:


Post a comment