April 14, 2010
Why Markets Matter for Evidence-Based Merger Analysis
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Malcolm B. Coate, U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Jeffrey H. Fischer, U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) explain Why Markets Matter for Evidence-Based Merger Analysis.
ABSTRACT: While the Merger Guidelines structure represents the standard approach to merger analysis in the US, economists have proposed methods to dispense with market definition and estimate the competitive effect directly. In this note, we argue that market definition is necessary to evaluate the assumptions of any merger analysis and thus, cannot be dispensed with. Moreover, we suggest that market definition plays an important role in the stakeholders’ merger guidance process, the regulator’s merger screening process, and the court’s merger decision process.
April 14, 2010 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Markets Matter for Evidence-Based Merger Analysis: