« Should Antitrust Condemn Tying Arrangements That Increase Price Without Restraining Competition?: A Response to Einer Elhauge's 'Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory' | Main | Dr. Miles' Orphans: Vertical Conspiracy and Consignment in the Wake of Leegin »
March 22, 2010
Procedural Convergence in Competition Law: Towards a Spontaneous Ius Commune?
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Anna Gerbrandy, University of Utrecht exploresProcedural Convergence in Competition Law: Towards a Spontaneous Ius Commune?
ABSTRACT: In this article I will address the question of whether substantive statutory convergence, by which is meant that national statutory law holds norms that are substantively the same as European law norms, is followed by spontaneous procedural convergence. This question will be addressed in focusing on Dutch competition law, which is substantively the same as EC competition law. This means that at the statutory level there is substantive convergence, but not necessarily statutory procedural convergence. Following a general assumption that procedural law is shaped by substantive law, the expectation may be that the statutory substantive convergence in Dutch competition law will give rise to procedural convergence at the level of the courts. Though this article focuses on the influence of European procedural law on national Dutch court proceedings, its findings have a wider relevance, because of the implications these findings may have on the thesis of a general developing procedural ius commune.
March 22, 2010 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Procedural Convergence in Competition Law: Towards a Spontaneous Ius Commune?: