Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, February 22, 2010

Does a Tougher Competition Policy Reduce or Promote Investment?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Afonso Costa, and Pedro P. Barros, Universidade Nova de Lisboa-Econ ask Does a Tougher Competition Policy Reduce or Promote Investment?

ABSTRACT: The question of how interventions from the Competition Authority (CA) affect investment is not a straightforward one: a tougher competition policy might, by reducing the ability to exert market power, either stimulate firms to invest more to counter the restrictions on their actions, or make firms invest less because of the reduced ability to have a return on investment.

This tension is illustrated using two models. In one model investment is own-cost-reducing whereas in the other investment is anti-competitive. Anti-competitive investments are defined as investments that increase competitors’ costs. In both models the optimal level of investment is reduced with a tougher competition policy. Furthermore, while in the case of an anti-competitive investment a tougher authority necessarily leads to lower prices, in the case of a cost-reducing investment the opposite may happen when the impact of the investment on cost is sufficiently high. Results for total welfare are ambiguous in the cost-reducing investment model, whereas in the anti-competitive investment model welfare unambiguously increases due to a tougher competition policy.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2010/02/does-a-tougher-competition-policy-reduce-or-promote-investment.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0128778f71a5970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Does a Tougher Competition Policy Reduce or Promote Investment?:

Comments

Post a comment