Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Staying, dropping, or switching : the impacts of bank mergers on small firms

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Hans Degryse (Tilburg University - Econ), Nancy Masschelein (National Bank of Belgium, Financial Department), and Janet Mitchell (National Bank of Belgium, Financial Department) address Staying, dropping, or switching : the impacts of bank mergers on small firms.

ABSTRACT: Assessing the impacts of bank mergers on small firms requires separating borrowers with single versus multiple banking relationships and distinguishing the three alternatives of "staying," "dropping," and "switching" of relationship. Single-relationship borrowers who "switch" to another bank following a merger will be less harmed than those whose relationship is "dropped" and not replaced. Using Belgian data, we find that single-relationship borrowers of target banks are more likely than other borrowers to be dropped. We track post-merger performance and show that many dropped target-bank borrowers are harmed by the merger. Multiple-relationship borrowers are less harmed, as they can better hedge against relationship discontinuations.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/11/staying-dropping-or-switching-the-impacts-of-bank-mergers-on-small-firms.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef012875645697970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Staying, dropping, or switching : the impacts of bank mergers on small firms:

Comments

Post a comment