Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, November 30, 2009

A Decision-Theoretic Rule of Reason for Minimum Resale Price Maintenance

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

LamberttThom Lambert of the University of Missouri School of Law discusses A Decision-Theoretic Rule of Reason for Minimum Resale Price Maintenance.

ABSTRACT: In its 2007 Leegin decision, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a 96 year-old precedent declaring vertical minimum resale price maintenance (RPM) to be per se illegal. The Court held that RPM should henceforward be evaluated under antitrust’s more lenient rule of reason, and it directed the lower courts to craft a structured liability analysis that will separate pro- from anticompetitive instances of the practice. Thus far, courts, regulators, and commentators have proposed four types of approaches for evaluative approach that would minimize the sum of decision and error costs, thereby maximizing the net social benefits of RPM regulation.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/11/a-decisiontheoretic-rule-of-reason-for-minimum-resale-price-maintenance-.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0120a6dea432970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Decision-Theoretic Rule of Reason for Minimum Resale Price Maintenance :

Comments

Post a comment