Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Optimizing Private Antitrust Enforcement

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Daniel A. Crane, University of Michigan Law School discusses Optimizing Private Antitrust Enforcement.

ABSTRACT: Private litigation is the predominant means of antitrust enforcement in the United States. Other jurisdictions around the world are increasingly implementing private enforcement models. Private enforcement is usually justified on either compensation or deterrence grounds. While the choice between these two goals matters, private litigation is not very effective at advancing either one. Compensation fails because the true economic victims of most antitrust violations are usually downstream consumers who are too numerous and remote to locate and compensate. Deterrence is ineffective because the time lag between the planning of the violation and legal judgment day is usually so long that the corporate managers responsible for the planning have left their corporate employer before the employer internalizes the cost of the violation. Private litigation needs to be entirely reconceptualized and redirected toward a forward-looking, problem-solving approach to market power issues.

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Optimizing Private Antitrust Enforcement:


Post a comment