August 7, 2009
Modern Industrial Economics and Competition Policy: Open Problems and Possible Limits
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Oliver Budzinski (Environmental and Business Economics - University of Southern Denmark) explores Modern Industrial Economics and Competition Policy: Open Problems and Possible Limits.
ABSTRACT: Naturally, competition policy is based on competition economics made applicable in terms of law and its enforcement. Within the different branches of competition economics, modern industrial economics, or more precisely game-theoretic oligopoly theory, has become the dominating paradigm both in the U.S. (since the 1990s Post-Chicago movement) and in the EU (so-called more economic approach in the 2000s). This contribution reviews the state of the art in antitrust-oriented modern industrial economics and, in particular, critically discusses open questions and possible limits of basing antitrust on modern industrial economics. In doing so, it provides some hints how to escape current enforcement problems in industrial economics-based competition policy on both sides of the Atlantic. In particular, the paper advocates a change of the way modern industrial economics is used in competition policy: instead of more and more case-by-cases analyses, the insights from modern industrial economics should be used to design better competition rules.
August 7, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Modern Industrial Economics and Competition Policy: Open Problems and Possible Limits: