July 23, 2009
Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement: The Problem of Simultaneity
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Former 2009 Swope Prize winner Eric Fraser has posted Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement: The Problem of Simultaneity.
ABSTRACT: Google Books represents the latest attempt at the centuries-old goal to build a universal library. In 2004, Google started scanning books from libraries around the world. Although it made copyright licensing agreements with some publishers, it did not obtain permission from each rights-holder before scanning, indexing, and displaying portions of books from the stacks of libraries. Unsurprisingly, authors and publishers sued for copyright violations. Google settled the class action lawsuit in a sweeping agreement that has raised suspicion from librarians, users, and the government. In this paper, I analyze the antitrust and competition issues in the settlement agreement. I find that the simultaneous aspects of agreements and pricing pose serious antitrust problems. The settlement effectively gives Google simultaneous agreements with virtually all the rights-holders to in-copyright American books. It also requires that Google set prices for books simultaneously. In a competitive market, both agreements and pricing would occur independently. Under current law, however, no potential competitor can make agreements with the rights-holders to orphan works. The simultaneity, therefore, concentrates pricing power, leading to cartel pricing (a problem under § 1 of the Sherman Act) and monopolization (a § 2 problem).
July 23, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement: The Problem of Simultaneity: