June 16, 2009
What Could Anti-Trust in the OECD Mean for Development?
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Peter A.G. van Bergeijk, Institute of Social Studies asks What Could Anti-Trust in the OECD Mean for Development?
ABSTRACT: The extra-territorial effects of cartels, mergers and other non-competitive activities require consideration especially if they harm consumers and firms in developing countries. This chapter provides an overview of the available empirical literature regarding the impact of cartels, mergers and abuses of dominance and that are rooted in the OECD. Typically the available evidence is not yet sufficiently comprehensive to allow robust conclusions, but (with no claim on accuracy), it seems reasonable that the direct impact on developing countries is very substantial and in welfare terms may exceed the contribution by Official Development Aid. OECD countries could contribute to development through the activities of their competition authorities and appropriate changes in legislation.
June 16, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Could Anti-Trust in the OECD Mean for Development?: