Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, June 11, 2009

The Single Entity Battle Continues: American Needle and the Seventh Circuit’s Hybrid Approach

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Gabe Feldman (Tulane Law) discusses The Single Entity Battle Continues: American Needle and the Seventh Circuit’s Hybrid Approach.

ABSTRACT: Courts have long struggled to articulate a coherent or sensible approach to applying the Sherman Act to sports leagues. While Major League Baseball avoided the complications through its infamous judicial exemption from the antitrust laws, antitrust decisions involving other professional sports leagues are riddled with inconsistencies and confusion. The Seventh Circuit recently added to the morass with its decision in American Needle.

In American Needle, the plaintiff, a manufacturer and designer of sports apparel, brought an antitrust suit challenging the decision of the National Football League (“NFL”) and its teams (via NFL Properties) to enter into an exclusive licensing relationship with Reebok for the manufacture and sale of headwear bearing NFL team logos. The NFL moved for summary judgment, arguing that it was immune from Section 1 scrutiny because it functions as a single entity... [and]...sports leagues have long viewed the single entity defense as the antitrust “holy grail.”

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/06/the-single-entity-battle-continues-american-needle-and-the-seventh-circuits-hybrid-approach.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef011570b7e3b4970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Single Entity Battle Continues: American Needle and the Seventh Circuit’s Hybrid Approach:

Comments

Post a comment