Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Energy Efficiency: Efficiency or Monopsony?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Brennan110 Tim Brennan of the University of Maryland-Baltimore Department of Economics has written Energy Efficiency: Efficiency or Monopsony?

ABSTRACT: The cliche in the electricity sector, the "cheapest power plant is the one we don't build," seems to neglect the benefits of the energy that plant would generate. Those overall benefits could be countered by benefits to consumers if "not building that plant" was the result of monopsony. A regulator acting as a monopsonist may need to avoid rationing demand at monopsony prices. Subsidizing energy efficiency to reduce electricity demand at the margin can solve that problem, if energy efficiency and electricity use are substitutes. We may not observe these effects if the regulator can set price as well as quantity, lacks buyer-side market power, or is legally precluded from denying generators a reasonable return on capital. Nevertheless, the possibility of monopsony remains significant in light of the debate as to whether antitrust enforcement should maximize consumer welfare or total welfare.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/06/energy-efficiency-efficiency-or-monopsony.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01157156f3cb970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Energy Efficiency: Efficiency or Monopsony?:

Comments

Post a comment