May 22, 2009
Exceptional Approval of Major Mergers: London and Brussels Compared
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Ian Forrester (White & Case) & Stefan Mahoney (White & Case) offer their thoughts on Exceptional Approval of Major Mergers: London and Brussels Compared.
ABSTRACT: This note records a short, urgent, highly-publicised attempt by a group of concerned citizens, the Merger Action Group (“MAG”), to challenge a rare governmental decision not to expose a government-favoured merger to the scrutiny of the otherwise applicable competition rules. The initiative was unsuccessful in appealing to the UK Competition Appeal Tribunal, which found, heavily against the applicants, that there had been no legal impropriety in the changing of the law to facilitate the transaction, or in the actions by the responsible minister when exercising his freshly-minted powers. We contrast the speed, rigour and efficiency which the CAT deployed with the norms prevailing in Brussels.
May 22, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Exceptional Approval of Major Mergers: London and Brussels Compared: