Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, April 20, 2009

Loyalty/Requirement Rebates and the AMC: What is the Appropriate Liability Standard?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Nicholas Economides of the Stern School of Business - NYU asks, Loyalty/Requirement Rebates and the AMC: What is the Appropriate Liability Standard?

ABSTRACT: I discuss and assess the various standards for establishing liability for loyalty discounts offered under a requirement contract. I find that the standard proposed by the Antitrust Modernization Commission is likely to result in many cases of violation that are not caught. The safe harbor defined by the AMC would permit activity that is in fact anticompetitive. I propose instead a structured rule of reason test that relies on consumers' surplus comparisons under the loyalty /requirement practice and the but-for world. The proposed standard does not have a safe harbor based on a price/cost comparison because such comparisons do not generally correspond to consumers' surplus comparisons.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/04/loyaltyrequirement-rebates-and-the-amc-what-is-the-appropriate-liability-standard.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01156f227634970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Loyalty/Requirement Rebates and the AMC: What is the Appropriate Liability Standard?:

Comments

Post a comment