April 6, 2009
Can the Commission use Article 82EC to Combat Tacit Collusion?
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Felix E. Mezzanotte (University of East Anglia - Centre for Competition Policy) asks Can the Commission use Article 82EC to Combat Tacit Collusion?
ABSTRACT: Recent events suggest that Article 82 may prohibit abusive and tacitly collusive conduct. Yet can the Commission enforce this law? In this article I argue it cannot. I tackle this question of enforcement from the perspective of proof and examine to what extent the Commission can establish the conduct of tacit collusion. I show that proof of tacit collusion requires the Commission to overcome a difficult problem of identification, notably how to distinguish tacit collusion from other very subtle conducts like unconscious parallelism and undetected overt collusion. I argue that the Commission cannot resolve this problem by establishing the typical conditions drawn from case law, such as the lack of effective competition, the Airtours criterion and a focal point, as this proof cannot mitigate error sufficiently. This seeks the Commission to produce greater cogency of evidence, yet only at the expense of rendering enforcement prohibitively onerous. I conclude that owing to a problem of proof (detection) Article 82 is unenforceable and can neither punish nor deter tacit collusion. This makes a policy of using Article 82 to combat tacit collusion ex post misconceived and suggests that tacit collusion admits only an ex ante legal treatment.
April 6, 2009 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Can the Commission use Article 82EC to Combat Tacit Collusion?: