Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Saturday, February 21, 2009

The New Consensus on Class Certification: What it Means for the Use of Economic and Statistical Evidence in Meeting the Requirements of Rule 23

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Evans David Evans (University of Chicago, University College London, LECG) addresses The New Consensus on Class Certification: What it Means for the Use of Economic and Statistical Evidence in Meeting the Requirements of Rule 23.

ABSTRACT: Offering expert testimony that is a hair's breadth away from nutty is no longer sufficient to secure class certification according to an emerging consensus across the circuit courts. The court must also get into any merits issues that are relevant to the class issues. As a practical matter credible expert testimony will prove more important going forward in all types of class certification for both plaintiffs and defendants. This note summarizes the consensus that is emerging and describes the sorts of analyses that will prove critical in seeking or opposing the certification of a particular class.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/02/the-new-consens.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef01116860d407970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The New Consensus on Class Certification: What it Means for the Use of Economic and Statistical Evidence in Meeting the Requirements of Rule 23 :

Comments

Is there a link to this article? Thanks.

Posted by: Craig | Feb 22, 2009 8:09:03 AM

Post a comment