Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, February 16, 2009

Schizophrenia in the Commission's Article 82 Guidance Paper: Formalism Alongside Increased Recourse to Economic Analysis

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

James Killick (White & Case) and Assimakis Komninos (White & Case and University College London) provide some insgihts into Schizophrenia in the Commission's Article 82 Guidance Paper: Formalism Alongside Increased Recourse to Economic Analysis.

ABSTRACT: The publication by the European Commission of its long-awaited Guidance Paper on exclusionary abuses under Article 82 EC was the most important policy development of the second half of 2008. It is certainly positive that the Commission eventually did proceed to publish something. Following the DG-COMP Discussion Paper in December 2005, there were fears that the Commission might not continue with the whole exercise.

The Guidance Paper’s ambitions are scaled back compared to the approach when reform of Article 82 EC was first raised in the 2005 Discussion Paper. It relies less on economic and legal jargon, and is, accordingly, a more accessible document. However, as explored in more detail below, there is an intellectual incoherence at the heart of the Guidance Paper: the formalism of the past coexists with a more economics-based analysis. This contradiction prevents the Paper from successfully modernizing the enforcement of Article 82 EC and taking the debate forwards.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/02/schizophrenia-i.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef011278d7772a28a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Schizophrenia in the Commission's Article 82 Guidance Paper: Formalism Alongside Increased Recourse to Economic Analysis:

Comments

Post a comment