Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, February 23, 2009

Abuse and Monopolization: Unilateral Conduct by Two Competition Authorities?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Gunnar Niels of Oxera offers insights into Abuse and Monopolization: Unilateral Conduct by Two Competition Authorities?

ABSTRACT: Within the space of a few months, two pre-eminent competition authorities issued widely publicized reports on unilateral conduct, one of the hotly debated topics in modern competition law. Both reports followed years of extensive review and consultation processes among practitioners and experts in each jurisdiction. Great expectations had been created. So, with these reports, have the two authorities laid down a marker for how unilateral conduct cases will be assessed in years to come?

Well, let's imagine we're in the year 2019. What would a competition practitioner at that point in time make of the Department of Justice's ("DOJ") report on single-firm conduct under Section 2 of the Sherman Act—published in September 2008—and of the European Commission's guidance on enforcement priorities in applying Article 82 EC Treaty, published in December 2008? In this article I explore the answer to this question. I anticipate that, in short, the future reader will be confused by both reports because the context in which they were produced is not made clear in either, but he or she will be even more confused by the European report than by the U.S. one.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/02/abuse-and-monop.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef011278d76e8128a4

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Abuse and Monopolization: Unilateral Conduct by Two Competition Authorities?:

Comments

Post a comment