Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, January 14, 2009

Why the Filed Rate Doctrine Should Not Imply Blanket Judicial Deference to Regulatory Agencies

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Jim Rossi, Florida State University College of Law argues Why the Filed Rate Doctrine Should Not Imply Blanket Judicial Deference to Regulatory Agencies.

ABSTRACT: The filed rate doctrine is a venerable doctrine of public utility regulation. Federal courts applying the doctrine frequently defer to the regulatory agency and refuse to consider the merits of alleged violations of antitrust, tort or contract claims where resolution would require a departure from a filed rate. For over a century, the filed rate doctrine has served many important purposes. However, with increased attention to market-based approaches to electric power, natural gas and telecommunications regulation, there is reason to question both the doctrine's continued applicability and usefulness. This short essay argues that, as regulators implement competitive markets in utility industries, at a minimum the traditional principles of deference which courts applied in this context need to be reassessed.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2009/01/why-the-filed-r.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef010536c57918970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why the Filed Rate Doctrine Should Not Imply Blanket Judicial Deference to Regulatory Agencies:

Comments

Post a comment