Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, December 12, 2008

The Economic Approach to Antitrust Damages: Learning from Two Nobel Laureates and Three Common Mistakes

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Richardrapp010_web_2 Richard T. Rapp (NERA) provides some lessons on The Economic Approach to Antitrust Damages: Learning from Two Nobel Laureates and Three Common Mistakes.

ABSTRACT: Can it be true that the quality of damage estimation in antitrust cases is better, on average  than in other branches of the law? If so, what explains that? And what accounts for the times when antitrust damages are done badly?

These are interesting questions, and in this issue of Antitrust Insights, Richard Rapp, a Special Consultant in NERA’s New York City office, considers the centrality of economics in solving antitrust problems, including damages, and the difference between economics- based expert testimony and “connoisseur” testimony. Recalling the mistakes that sometimes spoil antitrust damage calculations, Dick reminds us that the best analyses are based on theories of competitive harm that are consistent with case facts and benchmarks that are derived from realistic models of competitive pricing.

Download AT_insights_Winter.pdf

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/12/the-economic-ap.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef010536567a3e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Economic Approach to Antitrust Damages: Learning from Two Nobel Laureates and Three Common Mistakes:

Comments

Post a comment