Thursday, December 11, 2008
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Bruno Amable (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - CNRS, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I), Lilas Demmou (DGTPE - Direction Générale du Trésor et de la Politique Economique), and Ivan Ledezma (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - CNRS, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I) have written on Competition, Innovation and Distance to Frontier.
ABSTRACT: According to a recent literature, the positive effect of competition is supposed to be growing with the proximity to the technological frontier. Using a variety of indicators, the paper tests the effect of competition and regulation on innovative activity measured by patenting. The sample consists of a panel of 15 industries for 17 OECD countries over the period 1979-2003. Results show no evidence of a positive effect of competition growing with the proximity to the frontier. Two main configurations emerge. First, regulation has a positive effect whatever the distance to the frontier and the magnitude of its impact is higher the closer the industry is to the frontier. Second, the effect of regulation is negative far from the frontier and becomes positive (or non significant) when the technology gap decreases. These results contradict the belief in the innovation-boosting effect of product market deregulation such as taken into account in the Lisbon Strategy.