Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Setting the Standard: A Fraud-based Approach to Antitrust Pleading in Standard Development Organization Cases

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

James Esten Abell, an associate at Cleary, published a nice student note while at the University of Chicago in the Law Review on Setting the Standard: A Fraud-based Approach to Antitrust Pleading in Standard Development Organization Cases.

ABSTRACT: This Comment addresses the question of whether claims brought under Section 2 of the Sherman Act based on allegations of deception of a Standards Development Organization ("SDO") must meet the heightened pleading requirements of Rule 9(b). Despite the growing amount of litigation in this area, to date, no court has specifically addressed this matter. The Comment explores how courts have approached similar questions in other areas involving intellectual property law and antitrust law, such as Walker Process fraud claims. Ultimately, the Comment suggests a framework for evaluating these new claims and concludes that within the framework, SDO-based antitrust claims do meet the requirements for heightened pleading.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/11/setting-the-sta.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef010535f2acc2970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Setting the Standard: A Fraud-based Approach to Antitrust Pleading in Standard Development Organization Cases:

Comments

Post a comment