Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

State Illinois Brick Repealer Legislation: Major Options and a Proposed Model Statute

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Robert H. Lande of the University of Baltimore Law School has a new piece on State Illinois Brick Repealer Legislation: Major Options and a Proposed Model Statute.

ABSTRACT: Illinois Brick held that only direct purchasers successfully can sue for damages under federal antitrust law. Since this left most true victims of antitrust violations without an effective remedy, most states enacted Illinois Brick Repealers (IBRs), to give indirect purchasers the right to sue for damages when firms violate analogous state laws.

Although many benefits would arise if national legislation overturned Illinois Brick, to date every attempt to achieve a comprehensive federal solution has failed. Because this thirty year stalemate is almost certain to continue, this article instead focused on reform at the state level, where reform is much more achievable.

This article presents a large number of IBR options that address the spectrum of a state's potential needs, together with commentary giving the major effects, advantages and disadvantages of each. As its Conclusion, this article suggests its own Model State Illinois Brick Repealer legislation.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/10/state-illinois.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef010535585512970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference State Illinois Brick Repealer Legislation: Major Options and a Proposed Model Statute:

Comments

Post a comment