Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Changing the Presumption of When to Regulate: The Rationale of Canadian Telecommunications Reform

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Lawson A. W. Hunter (Stikeman Elliot), Philippe Gauvin (Regulatory Affairs, Bell Canada) and David Krause (Economic Analysis, Bell Canada) have published Changing the Presumption of When to Regulate: The Rationale of Canadian Telecommunications Reform.

ABSTRACT: In a dynamic environment such as the telecommunications industry, it becomes increasingly difficult to consistently determine and enforce optimal regulatory responses. To improve the rigor and responsiveness of the regulator, the regulatory process should contain four elements: (i) the regulator should have a clear policy framework with an emphasis on reliance upon market forces to the maximum extent feasible; (ii) the regulator should be subject to a standards-based, legally binding test; (iii) there should be an advocate for market forces; and (iv) there should be regular and frequent external reviews. Recent changes to the regulatory process for the Canadian telecommunications industry have incorporated all four of these elements. These changes should limit the regulatory process' ability to impede the benefits that Canadians receive from continuing technological innovation and increasing competitiveness of the telecommunications industry.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/08/changing-the-pr.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e553eef0838833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Changing the Presumption of When to Regulate: The Rationale of Canadian Telecommunications Reform:

Comments

Post a comment