Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Unilateral Refusals to Deal and the Antitrust Modernization Commission Report

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Keith Hylton of BU Law School brings us Unilateral Refusals to Deal and the Antitrust Modernization Commission Report.

ABSTRACT: The Antitrust Modernization Commission recommends that refusals to deal with rivals in the same market should rarely, if ever, be unlawful. I will focus on the principles that should determine the legal standard governing unilateral refusals to deal. A legal test that is strongly biased in favor of defendants, as the Commission recommends, is desirable as a default rule and especially in cases in which the essential facility at the core of the refusal to deal dispute is efficiency enhancing. However, there is another set of cases in which the defendant gains control of an essential market portal. In these cases, a legal test that is less biased toward defendants may be preferable to the Commission's suggested approach.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/07/unilateral-refu.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5539205ee8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Unilateral Refusals to Deal and the Antitrust Modernization Commission Report:

Comments

Post a comment