July 16, 2008
Chicago Reigns Supreme: The Chicago School, Transaction Cost Economics and the Roberts Court's Antitrust Jurisprudence
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Josh Wright of George Mason Law School (also the only law school professor to have been the former roommate of Boston Celtics star Paul Pierce at basketball camp) has added another piece in his Chicago School analysis of antitrust in The Chicago School, Transaction Cost Economics and the Roberts Court's Antitrust Jurisprudence.
ABSTRACT: The Roberts Court's reign at the United States Supreme Court is only in its nascent stages. Already, however, its antitrust activity level has far exceeded the Court's single case average prior to the 2003-04 Term by a significant margin. The recent flurry of antitrust activity and the likely significance the Roberts Court will have on the development of antitrust jurisprudence warrants some reflection and analysis. I argue that the Roberts Court decisions embrace the Chicago School of antitrust analysis, Transaction Cost Economics, and insights from comparative institutional analysis gleaned from New Institutional Economics. Despite the rise of Post-Chicago Economics in economics departments and elite journals, the substance of the Roberts Court's antitrust jurisprudence suggests a significant amount of skepticism is appropriate concerning any prediction of the demise of the Chicago School or Transaction Cost Economics in antitrust in the coming years.
July 16, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Chicago Reigns Supreme: The Chicago School, Transaction Cost Economics and the Roberts Court's Antitrust Jurisprudence: