« Comments on the CFI's Recent Ruling in Deutsche Telekom v. European Commission | Main | Observations on the Commission’s Evanston Remedy: When Is Divestiture, or Any Remedy, Not Appropriate for a Consummated Anticompetitive Merger? »
June 5, 2008
Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword?
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Jennifer Driscoll (Mayer Brown) asks about Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword?
ABSTRACT: The rewards and pitfalls of standard setting conjure images of the legend of Damocles. From afar, the benefits of a “collaborative standard-setting process [that] enable[s] industry participants to share knowledge and develop a best-of-breed product or process” (Barnett, 2006) appear enormously attractive.
The widespread acceptance of a standard that promotes product interoperability “may expand the availability of a technology and ancillary products and services by enabling more firms to rapidly enter and serve the market,” thus “impart[ing] pro-competitive benefits to markets and their participants, both producers and consumers, by capitalizing on the ‘network effects’ at play in an advanced industrial economy” (Carvill & Khoja, 2003).
Despite these substantial rewards, the specter of patent holdup looms as an ever-present threat.
June 5, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword? :
Nice link! Could be a nice paper. But there is no way we could download it (only open for suscribers). What a pity!! Regards, francisco
Posted by: Francisco | Jun 5, 2008 8:13:07 AM