Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Observations on the Commission’s Evanston Remedy: When Is Divestiture, or Any Remedy, Not Appropriate for a Consummated Anticompetitive Merger?

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol



ABSTRACT: On April 28, 2008, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission issued its final order, specifying the remedy for the antitrust violation it determined Evanston Northwestern Healthcare Corporation and Highland Park Hospital committed in 2000 when ENHC acquired Highland Park. The Commission had already decided on August 6, 2007, that it would forego a structural remedy (i.e., divestiture) in favor of a conduct remedy.

The April order established the specific terms of the remedial conduct order. Perhaps more importantly, it is the most recent decision from an enforcement agency regarding remedies for consummated anticompetitive mergers and stakes out a position significantly different from prior indications.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/06/observations-on.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e552a467ea8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Observations on the Commission’s Evanston Remedy: When Is Divestiture, or Any Remedy, Not Appropriate for a Consummated Anticompetitive Merger?:

Comments

Post a comment