« Bundling as Exclusionary Pricing to Maintain Monopoly | Main | Anticompetitive Rebates in EC Competition Law: A Way Forward? »
June 17, 2008
Litigating Merger Challenges: Lessons Learned
Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
FTC Commissioner Tom Rosch gives some thought to Litigating Merger Challenges: Lessons Learned in a recent speech.
ABSTRACT: The decisions in Arch Coal and Oracle in 2004, and Whole Foods and Foster this past year, has led to some sober reflection both inside and outside of the agencies. Indeed, the Federal Trade Commission held a one day workshop on merger litigation and unilateral effects theories this past February. The day was spent reflecting on the agencies’ recent merger litigation experiences and debating whether the agencies should consider changes to its approach – specifically its approach to unilateral effects cases like Oracle and Whole Foods. I thought I would share some of my thoughts on the issue in light of both my experience as a member of the Commission and my experience as a member of Oracle’s litigation team that prevailed against the Department of Justice in 2004. I believe that there are lessons to be learned from these experiences – both from the cases we lost but also from the cases we won.
June 17, 2008 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5536c199c8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Litigating Merger Challenges: Lessons Learned:
