Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Monday, June 30, 2008

Competition Policy and the Incentive to Innovate: The Dynamic Effects of Microsoft V. Commission

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Spulber_pic Dan Spulber of Northwestern University Kellog School of Business has posted Competition Policy and the Incentive to Innovate: The Dynamic Effects of Microsoft v. Commission.

ABSTRACT: Microsoft v. Commission indicates a shift in competition policy at the expense of protections for intellectual property. The case applies essential facilities arguments to Microsoft's server operating system and tying arguments to its Windows Media Player. The dynamic effects of Microsoft v. Commission pose a substantial risk to the incentive to innovate in several ways. First, mandatory licensing and unbundling of the elements of an invention erode intellectual property rights. Second, the targeting of multinational corporations by the European Union creates barriers to international trade whose impacts extend across the global economy. Third, the interpretation of abuse of a dominant position focuses on market outcomes rather than on anticompetitive conduct, thus penalizing successful innovators and rewarding their competitors. Competition policy based on Microsoft v. Commission diminishes the incentive to innovate.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/06/competition-p-3.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5539537028834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Competition Policy and the Incentive to Innovate: The Dynamic Effects of Microsoft V. Commission:

Comments

Post a comment