Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Microsoft (EC) and Duty to Deal: Exceptionality and the Transatlantic Divide

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

FoxEleanor Fox of NYU Law provides a detailed analysis of Microsoft (EC) and Duty to Deal: Exceptionality and the Transatlantic Divide in her latest article.

ABSTRACT: This article examines Microsoft’s offense in withholding full information to its workgroup server operating systems rivals so that they could not interoperate with Microsoft’s systems as seamlessly as Microsoft could.

This article agrees with John Vickers’ observation that the Court stretched each of the Magill/IMS criteria defining circumstances so exceptional that they warrant a duty to deal, and thus created confusion as to the limits of exceptionality. It argues that the Court should have resorted to concept rather than factors (principles rather than rules) to define exceptionality, and that, doing so, it might have reached the same outcome, but in a more principled way. The article concludes, however, that the duty-to-deal outcome in Microsoft is not the only logical one; indeed, where a court ends is a function of where it begins.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/05/microsoft-ec-an.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e55214ffc28833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Microsoft (EC) and Duty to Deal: Exceptionality and the Transatlantic Divide:

Comments

Post a comment