Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Stephen M. Maurer and Suzanne Scotchmer both of Berkeley's Goldman School of Public Policy address Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law.

ABSTRACT: We address the patent/antitrust conflict in licensing and develop three guiding principles for deciding acceptable terms of license. Profit neutrality holds that patent rewards should not depend on the rightholder's ability to work the patent himself. Derived reward holds that the patentholder's profits should be earned, if at all, from the social value created by the invention. Minimalism holds that licenses should not be more restrictive than necessary to achieve neutrality. We argue that these principles are economically sound and rationalize some key decisions of the twentieth century such as General Electric and Line Material.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/03/profit-neutrali.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e550f98d7e8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law:

Comments

Post a comment