Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, February 5, 2008

The Paradox of the Exclusion of Exploitative Abuse

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Bruce Lyons of the University of East Anglia explains The Paradox of the Exclusion of Exploitative Abuse.

ABSTRACT: Monopoly pricing is a textbook market failure that is taught in the first year of any economics course. The implied welfare loss (or 'exploitative abuse') justifies a whole range of competition policy towards cartels, mergers and regulated industries. Yet there is widespread hostility to prosecuting the same exploitative abuse in the textbook monopoly case (i.e. under Article 82EC)! This paper seeks to understand this paradox. I conclude that, while there are important problems with prosecuting Article 82 exploitation cases (because of problems relating to measurement, market dynamics, multi-sided markets and remedy issues), it is important to keep open the possibility of prosecution; for example, in the forthcoming Article 82 Guidelines.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/02/the-paradox-of.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5502ad2d18834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Paradox of the Exclusion of Exploitative Abuse:

Comments

Post a comment