Antitrust & Competition Policy Blog

Editor: D. Daniel Sokol
University of Florida
Levin College of Law

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Friday, February 15, 2008

Safe Harbors for Quantity Discounts and Bundling

Posted by D. Daniel Sokol

Dennis Carlton (University of Chicago Graduate School of Business ) and Michael Waldman (Cornell University Johnson School of Business) take issue with the AMC Report as it deals with bundling in Safe Harbors for Quantity Discounts and Bundling.

ABSTRACT: The courts and analysts continue to struggle to articulate safe harbors for a wide variety of common business pricing practices in which either a single product is sold at a discount if purchased in bulk or in which multiple products are bundled together at prices different from the ones that would emerge if the products were purchased separately. The phenomenon of tying in which the sale of one product is conditioned on the purchase of another is closely related to bundling. Its analysis relies on the same economics as that used to analyze bundling (see, e.g., Carlton and Waldman (2008)), though the law seems to make a distinction between the two. The need for safe harbors for common business pricing practices arises from the recognition that these practices often are motivated by efficiency and that a broad antitrust attack on them could cause more harm than good. In this essay, we analyze and propose safe harbors for quantity discounts and bundled products. In analyzing the latter case, we discuss the deficiencies of the particular safe harbor proposed in the report of the Antitrust Modernization Commission (2007) (AMC) of which Carlton was a member.

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/antitrustprof_blog/2008/02/safe-harbors-fo.html

| Permalink

TrackBack URL for this entry:

http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5505f54ef8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Safe Harbors for Quantity Discounts and Bundling:

Comments

Post a comment