Adjunct Law Prof Blog

Editor: Mitchell H. Rubinstein
New York Law School

Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Fordham: Lawyering in the Regulatory State

In addition to the symposia listed in a post below, Fordham Law Review is hosting a one-day symposium on October 16, 2015, titled "Lawyering in the Regulatory State."  Click here for more information.

Craig Estlinbaum

October 14, 2015 in Conferences, Faculty, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Texas Judge Cleared in Facebook Case

This past April, I reported on this blog that a Texas district judge had been publicly admonished by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct for posting on her Facebook page information about a case she was trying.  The district judge appealed that reprimand and on September 30, a three-judge Special Court of Appeals found that the Commission, "failed to meet its  burden of proving the [Judge] violated the Canons of Judicial Conduct or Article V, Section 1-a(6)(A) of the Texas Constitution."  The Special Court dismissed the Commission's public admonition and found the Judge not guilty of all charges.

The Commission's public admonishment is here and the Special Court's judgment dismissing that admonishment is here.

See Also:

Craig Estlinbaum

October 13, 2015 in Current Events, Ethics, First Amendment, Interesting Cases, Judges, Texas Law | Permalink | Comments (1)

Law Reviews: New In Print

California Law Review, Volume 103, No. 5, (October 2015) includes:

  • Waiving Disqualification: When Do Securities Violators Receive a Reprieve? (Urska Velikonja);
  • Stare Decisis in the Second-Best World (Randy J. Kozel);
  • Regulating Sex Work: Erotic Assimilationism, Erotic Exceptionalism, and the Challenge of Intimate Labor (Adrienne D. Davis); and
  • Marital Supremacy and the Constitution of the Nonmarital Family (Serena Mayeri); and
  • Two Student Comments.

Georgetown Law Journal, Volume 103, No. 6, includes:

  • Cognative Cleansing:  Experimental Psychology and the Exclusionary Rule (Avani Mehta Sood);
  • Admin (Elizabeth F. Emens);
  • Patent Conflicts (Tejas N. Narechania); and
  • Three Student Comments.

Michigan State Law Review, Volume 2015, No. 2, includes articles from a symposia on net neutrality, including:

  • Is There Anything New to Say About Network Neutrality? (Adam Candeub);
  • Aereo:  From Working Around Copyright to Thinking About Cable Box (Annemarie Brady);
  • Aereo and the Problem of Machine Volition (Bruce E. Boyden);
  • Defining the Limits of the Application of the Statutory Experimental Use Exception Within the Agricultural Biotechnology Industry (Jennifer Carter-Johnson);
  • Agricultural Biotechnology:  Drawing on International Law to Promote Progress (J. Janewa Osei-Tutu);
  • Regulatory Competitive Shelters as Incentives for Innovation in Agrobiotech (Yaniv Heled)
  • Living with Monsanto (Daryl Lim);
  • Net Neutrality:  Something Old; Something New (Justin (Gus) Hurwitz);
  • The Risks and Rewards of Network Neutrality Under Sec. 706 (John Blevins);
  • What's New in the Network Neutrality Debate (Rob Frieden);
  • Patent Pledges: Between Public Domain and Market Exclusivity (Jorge L. Contreras);
  • The Right to Innovate (Andrew W. Torrence & Eric von Hipple);
  • Incongruities of Real and Intellectual Property: Economic Concepts in Patent Policy and Practice (Thomas D. Jeitschko); and
  • Leaps, Metes, and Bounds:  Innovation Law and its Logistics (James Ming Chen).

South Texas Law Review, Volume 56, No. 2, includes:

  • Challenging Class Certification at the Pleading Stage:  What Rule Should Govern and What Standard Should Apply? (Timothy A. Daniels);
  • To Quote or Not To Quote:  Making the Case for Teaching Law Students the Art of Effective Quotation in Legal Memoranda (Maureen Johnson); and
  • Law Firm Copying and Fair Use:  An Examination of Different Purpose and Fair Use Markets (D. R. Jones).
  • Three Student Comments

Craig Estlinbaum

October 13, 2015 in Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Monday, October 12, 2015

Three Law Review Symposia this Week

There are three law review symposia being held this week -- two in Detroit and one in Manhattan (NY).  They are:

On Thursday, October 15, the Cardoza Law Review is hosting "Ten Years the Chief:  Examining a Decade of John Roberts on the Supreme Court" at the law school campus.   The symposia includes four panels covering John Roberts and Constitutional Interpretation, John Roberts and the Judicial Process, The Administrative Role of the Chief Justice, and John Roberts and Statutory Interpretation.  For more information, including how to RSVP, click here.

The Wayne Law Review will host its Fall Symposium, "Corporate Counsel as Gatekeepers" at the law school campus in midtown Detroit.  The symposium includes an in-house counsel panel, an academic panel and a practitioner panel.  Tony West, former associate U.S. attorney general and general counsel for PepsiCo, is scheduled to provide the keynote address. For more information, click here.

Also, the Detroit Mercy Law Review is hosting its Fall Symposium, "The Public Trust Doctrine: An Ancient Tool for Protecting the Great Lakes from New Hazards" at the law school's campus in downtown Detroit.  The law review's website shows six participants on the program.

Craig Estlinbaum

October 12, 2015 in Conferences, CLE, Conferences, Faculty, Corporate Counsel, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Tuesday, October 6, 2015

Obama Administration Sues School Over Service Dog

A school in upstate New York has been sued by the Department of Justice for refusing to allow a disabled student to bring his service dog to school without a handler provided by the child's family.  An article about this suit can be found here.  A copy of the complaint is here

Law review commentary on the use of service dogs in school would be welcome.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

October 6, 2015 in Discrimination Law, Education Law, Law Review Ideas | Permalink | Comments (0)

Mandatory Retirement For Lawyers

An interesting Oct. 5, 2015 Findlaw article, here   raises the question how old to too old to practice law. 

As the article notes, many law firms have a mandatory retirement age of 65. Such mandatory retirement policies would expressly violate the ADEA unless the ADEA does not apply. As the article alludes to, the legal question is whether such partners are employees. If they are, the ADEA applies. If they are not, the ADEA does not apply. Though there has been litigation on this issue, it is not finally resolved. 

As the article notes, mandatory retirement of lawyers appears ridiculous when Supreme Court Justices routinely serve into their 80's.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein 

October 6, 2015 in Employment Discrimination, Lawyers | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Texas A&M Law Review: Food Law Symposium

The Texas A&M Law Review is hosting a symposium, "Farm to Table: Agriculture Law in the Era of Sustainability" on October 30 at the school's Amon G. Carter Lecture Hall.  The keynote speakers are Dr. Mark Hussy, Dean of Agriculture & Life Sciences at Texas A&M and Professor James Chen, Michigan State College of Law.  For more information, look here.

Craig Estlinbaum

 

September 30, 2015 in Conferences, CLE, Conferences, Faculty | Permalink | Comments (1)

Monday, September 28, 2015

Union Membership Surges in Indiana After Passage of Right to Work Law

In what may appear to be completely contradictory, union membership is surging in Indiana after that state passed a Right to Work Law, here.  As the cited article states:

Indiana had 299,000 union members last year, up from 249,000 union members in 2013, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Union membership, which dipped as low as 9.1 percent of the workforce in 2012, was back to 10.7 percent of the workforce in 2014.

And the number of Indiana workers who are represented by unions in their workplace, but not necessarily dues-paying members, rose to 335,000 last year, which is 12 percent of the total workforce.

The rhetoric is that unions – which represented a quarter of all American workers as recently as 1980 – are dying, a relic of a bygone age. But Northwest Indiana and much of the state remain bastions of the labor movement.  

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

September 28, 2015 in Unions | Permalink | Comments (0)

Symposium: Storming the Court

The New York Law School Law Review is hosting a symposium, "Storming the Court: 25 Years After H. C. C. v. Sale" on October 16 at the law school's Events Center.  This description comes from the Law Review's website:

In the early 1990s, well before the War on Terror, Guantanamo Bay served as a detention camp for three hundred HIV-positive refugees who had fled a military coup in Haiti.  In a remarkable human rights case chronicled in the book Storming the Court (Scribner) by Brandt Goldstein, law students at Yale and their professor, Harold Koh – himself the son of refugees – sued the U.S. government for the Haitians’ freedom.  The case, which ultimately involved Kenneth Starr, the Justice Department, the Pentagon, and Presidents George H.W. Bush and Bill Clinton, went to trial in federal court in Brooklyn, resulting in the Haitians’ release – and the first ruling in history that aliens held at Guantanamo are entitled to constitutional due process.

Almost 25 years later, with Guantanamo still looming large in the legal and foreign policy landscape, this symposium brings together the judge in the case, the Honorable Sterling Johnson, Jr. (E.D.N.Y.), as well as Professor Harold Koh (former Legal Adviser at the State Department), government attorneys, human rights lawyers and advocates, private practitioners, and seven of the most prominent former students (now all human rights advocates, lawyers and/or academics themselves) to explore the enduring impact of this extraordinary litigation.

Craig Estlinbaum

September 28, 2015 in Conferences, Faculty, Constitutional Law, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Monday, September 14, 2015

Minnesota Law Review Symposium

The Minnesota Law Review will host its Fall Symposium, "Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Celebrating 100 Volumes of the Minnesota Law Review," on October 2 at Walter F. Mondale Hall on the law school campus.  Daniel Farber (Cal-Berkeley) will give the keynote address.  Symposium topics include "The Right to Counsel," "Strict Liability," "The Fourth Amendment," and "Critical Race Theory and the Supreme Court."  Click here for more information.

Craig Estlinbaum

September 14, 2015 in Conferences, Faculty, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Tuesday, September 8, 2015

Illinois: Free Speech Symposium

University of Illinois Law Review has published an online symposium with four essays in response to Alexander Tsesis's book, Free Speech Constitutionalism.  The essays are collected in the most recent issue of the journal's online companion, Slip Opinions.  Contributors are Mark A. Graber, David S. Han, Helen Norton and Margot E. Kaminsky.

Craig Estlinbaum

September 8, 2015 in Book Reviews, Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Law Professors, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

What to Make of Obergefell?

California Law Review and the American Constitution Society is hosting a panel discussion, "What to Make of Obergefell?:  A Moderated Discussion with Professor Melissa Murray" this week.  The panel discussion will be September 10 at the Boalt Hall campus and will address the Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell v. Hodges.  Participants include Elizabeth Gill, ACLU of Northern California; Alexandra Robert Gordon, California Deputy Attorney General; and Maxwell Pritt, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, L.L.P.

Craig Estlinbaum

September 8, 2015 in Equal Protection, Faculty in the News, Interesting Cases, Law Professors, Law Schools | Permalink | Comments (0)

Sunday, September 6, 2015

UALR Law Review Call for Papers

The UALR Law Review has posted a call for papers for its February 5, 2016 symposium, "Legal Hacking: Technology and Innovation in the Legal Profession."  The full announcement is here.

Craig Estlinbaum

 

September 6, 2015 in Announcements, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Friday, September 4, 2015

Carlson: A Child's Right to a Family

Richard Carlson (South Texas) has posted, "A Child's Right to a Family versus a State's Right to Institutionalize the Child," on SSRN.  Carlson's article explores tension in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child between institutionalization and family placement as options for children without parents or guardians.  Carlson acknowledges the Convention adopts a "child's best interest" standard toward placement and embraces the benefits of raising children in a "family environment."  However, Carlson argues that the Convention's grant of broad discretion to states to institutionalize children, "cannot be squared with a 'child’s best interests,' the 'family environment' ideal or modern child development theory.

Carlson's abstract reads:

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), declares that a child has the right to be raised in a "family environment." Nevertheless, the CRC grants states the discretion to institutionalize children who are without functioning families. States have this discretion because the CRC does not require states to arrange, facilitate, or even allow for child placement in a permanent, substitute family. In this article, I describe this contradiction in international law -- a child's right a family environment versus the state's discretion to institutionalize the child -- and I explore the possible reasons for the contradiction. A chief reason for the contradiction is anxiety about intercountry adoption. I propose some ways to resolve the contradiction and to pave the way for the creation of a true right to a family, including by placement in a permanent substitute family.

Craig Estlinbaum

September 4, 2015 in Family Law, Law Professors, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, September 3, 2015

Sunstein: In Praise of Law Reviews

Cass Sunstein (Harvard) has posted his essay, "In Praise of Law Reviews (And Jargon-Filled, Academic Writing)," on SSRN.  The abstract reads:

Many people, including many lawyers and judges, disparage law reviews (and the books that sometimes result from them) on the ground that they often deal with abstruse topics, of little interest to the bar, and are sometimes full of jargon-filled, excessively academic, and sometimes impenetrable writing. Some of the objections are warranted, but at their best, law reviews show a high level of rigor, discipline, and care; they have a kind of internal morality. What might seem to be jargon is often a product of specialization, similar to what is observed in other fields (such as economics, psychology, and philosophy). Much academic writing in law is not intended for the bar, at least not in the short-term, but that is not a problem: Such writing is meant to add to the stock of knowledge. If it succeeds, it can have significant long-term effects, potentially affecting what everyone takes to be “common sense.”

Sunstein's essay is forthcoming in the Michigan Law Review.

Craig Estlinbaum

September 3, 2015 in Law Professors, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (0)

Thursday, August 20, 2015

"The Luckiest Court in the Universe"

Daniel Nazer at techdirt.com reports that if patent litigation cases were evenly distributed among the 94 federal district courts in the United States, each court would have 33 such cases filed so far this year.  As it happens, the Eastern District of Texas has seen 1,387 patent cases filed this year in that particular jurisdiction.

How did the Eastern District become the mecca for patent litigation filings?  Nazer's article, "Why Patent Trolls Love East Texas... And Why Congress Needs To Fix It," tells that story.

Craig Estlinbaum

August 20, 2015 in Federal Law, Technology | Permalink | Comments (0)

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

Gallup Poll Indicates Support For Unions Are Increasing

On August 17, 2015, Gallup released the following:

Americans' approval of labor unions has jumped five percentage points to 58% over the past year, and is now at its highest point since 2008, when 59% approved. In the interim, the image of organized labor had suffered, sinking to an all-time low of 48% in 2009.

Trend: Do you approve or disapprove of labor unions?

Gallup first asked Americans about organized labor in 1936, a year after Congress legalized private-sector unions and collective bargaining. At that time, 72% of Americans approved of unions. Support remained high into the 1960s, but then dipped through the 1970s until it reached 55% in 1979. It has since varied, reaching as high as 66% in 1999 and as low as the 48% in 2009.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

 

August 19, 2015 in Unions | Permalink | Comments (0)

NLRB Declines To Assert Jurisdiction Over Northwestern Football Players

Nlrbseal

In a widely watched decision, the NLRB ruled on August 17, 2015 that it would not assert jurisdiction in an election petition filed by Northwestern student football players. Northwestern University, 362 NLRB No. 167 (Aug. 17, 2015).

The NLRB Regional Director found, in a March 26, 2014 decision, that grant-in-aid scholarship players were employees under Section 2(3) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), and directed the holding on an election, which took place on April 25, 2014.

In this week's decision, the NLRB Board concluded that even if the at-issue scholarship players were employees under the NLRA, it would not effectuate the policies of that law to assert jurisdiction in what the NLRB described as a novel and unique case involving college football players:

                        In declining jurisdiction, the NLRB Board noted that it has never heard a prior case                         involving college athletes or a representation petition seeking a unit of a single college                         team or a group of college teams.  In addition, the NCAA's uniform rules, regulations                         and standards regarding collegiate sports results in "a substantial degree of [NCAA]                         control over the operations of individual member teams, including many of the terms                         and conditions under which the scholarship players (as well as walk-on players) practice                         and play the game."  

In its August 17, 2015 decision, however, the NLRB Board distinguished the college football players from graduate student assistants in Brown University and New York University, 332 NLRB 1205 (2000) because the at-issue players are undergraduates who receive sports scholarships and their extracurricular football activities are generally unrelated to their studies.  Lastly, it expressly chose not to determine whether the at-issue players were employees under the NLRA.

The decision is significant for a number of reasons. First, it is extremely rare for the NLRB to decline jurisdiction on the basis of public policy. Indeed in a footnote the Board only cited to one other decision where it declined jurisdiction. Second, this case was 5-0. I do not recall any recent 5-0 decisions over controversial issues and this issue is certainly controversial and generated a lot of media attention. Query, whether this decision would have any impact over whether graduate students (aka Brown University) or medical interns ( aka Boston Medical) are students under the NLRA.

Law review commentary on this important topic is certainly welcome.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

August 19, 2015 in NLRB | Permalink | Comments (0)

Monday, August 10, 2015

Is it too cold at work? Maybe its because it is a man's world

Chilly at Work, is an interesting August 3, 2015 article from the New York Times. Ever notice how woman always seem cold at work? Well, as the article points out, this may be because air conditioning systems were designed for men. 

Professor Charles Sullivan (Seton Hall Law School) and an editor over at Workplace Prof Blog, an expert in employment discrimination, raises the question whether such a claim could be actionable under Title VII under a disparate impact type theory. He appears very skeptical. 

It seems to me that maybe, just maybe if employees are disciplined or not given certain office assignments because of the temp in the office, maybe there might be something to think about. 

Seems like a perfect law review article.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

August 10, 2015 in Law Professors, Law Review Ideas, Legal Humor, Misc., Legal, Misc., Non-Legal | Permalink | Comments (0)

Friday, July 24, 2015

Law Professor Survey For Law Review Article

Professor Cynthia Bond writes to request that law professors answer a survey about popular culture in the law school classroom. A cover letter from Professor Bond and a link to her survey are below.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

___________

Greetings Law Teacher Colleagues:

 I am working on an article this summer on uses of popular culture in the law school classroom.  I am defining popularculture broadly to include mass culture texts like movies, TV shows, popular music, images which circulate on the internet, etc, and also any current events that you may reference in the classroom which are not purely legal in nature (i.e. not simply a recent court decision).

 To support this article, I am doing a rather unscientific survey to get a sense of what law professors are doing in this area.  If you are a law professor and you use popular culture in your class, I would be most grateful if you could answer this quick, anonymous survey I have put together:

 https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/QH3GBZK

 Thanks in advance for your time and have a wonderful rest of summer!

 Cynthia Bond

The John Marshall Law School

Chicago, IL

 

July 24, 2015 in Law Professors, Law Review Articles | Permalink | Comments (1)