Adjunct Law Prof Blog

Editor: Mitchell H. Rubinstein
New York Law School

Friday, August 24, 2007

Interesting Article About Supreme Court's Pending Decision In Hall Street Associates Concerning Whether The Standard Of Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards Can Be Altered By Contract

In a August 23, 2007 article by Justin Kelly appearing in (free trial available)entitled "Supreme Court Urged to Allow for Expanded Review Under FAA", Mr. Kelly does a nice job of laying out the important legal issues that are involved in the pending U.S. Supreme Court case, Hall Street Associates v. Mattel, Inc., ___U.S. ___, No. 06-989, cert granted May 29, 2007.

In this case, the Supreme Court will decide whether the parties by contract can alter the standard of judicial review under the FAA. Stated another way, the Court will have to decide whether freedom of contract principles allow parties to change the statutory standard of judicial review.

Mr. Kelly interviewed me and quotes me as follows:

Mitchell H. Rubinstein, an adjunct professor at St. John's Law School and New York Law School, said the issue of expanded review is "very important to the arbitration field because ADR is being used more often" to resolve a wide range of disputes.

Rubinstein said that if you tinker with the limited judicial review scheme, arbitration could become "a first level court" instead of a final and binding process envisioned in the FAA.

I have previously wrote a law review article about a similar topic which addresses this issue under the FAA, Altering Judicial Review Of Labor Arbitration Awards, 2006 Mich. St. L. Rev. 235 (Summer)and also blogged about Hall Street Associates here.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein 

August 24, 2007 in Adjuncts in the News, Arbitration Law, Current Events, Faculty in the News, Interesting Cases | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Rutgers Law-Newark Adjunct Professor's Legal Problems

Professor Paul Caron, who runs the law professor blog network which hosts this blog, posted a report on his own Tax Prof Blog about a May 16, 2007 Tax Court decision concerning the failure of an adjunct law school professor at Rutgers Law-Newark to report capital gains from stocks. Remarkably, this professor did not even show up to her own hearing. Apparently, this adjunct professor together with her husband, a full-time law professor at Rutgers-Newark, are both leaders in the animal rights movement.

I guess sometimes you cannot make stuff up even about adjunct law professors!

Mitchell Rubinstein

Thanks Paul for the referral


May 17, 2007 in Adjuncts in the News | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)