Adjunct Law Prof Blog

Editor: Mitchell H. Rubinstein
New York Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Thursday, May 23, 2013

DC Circuit Reverses Board In Campaign Threat Case

DCCir2
The DC Circuit holds that the NLRB lacked substantial evidence to support its conclusion that a hospital executive's comments during a union organizing campaign conveyed a threat to employees. Flagstaff Med. Ctr. Inc. v. NLRB, ___F.3d____(D.C. Cir. April 26, 2013). 

A divided Board  found that the employer's President illegally threatened employees when he told them in a campaign meeting that he would not negotiate if the union was certified. But the court found that while the President told employees he would not personally participate in negotiations, he never ruled out the possibility negotiations would occur.

The court also rejected NLRB's conclusion that the hospital fired a union supporter because of his union activity. Rather, the court concluded that there was ample proof the employee was fired for attendance problems.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs/2013/05/dc-circuit-reverses-board-in-campaign-threat-case.html

NLRB | Permalink

Comments

Post a comment