Adjunct Law Prof Blog

Editor: Mitchell H. Rubinstein
New York Law School

A Member of the Law Professor Blogs Network

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

School district’s refusal to provide allegric student with a nut free environment did not constitute an actionable threat of violence or harm under California law

McCue v. South Fork Union Elementary Sch., ___F.Supp.2d____ (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011), is an unusual case. . A federal district court in California has dismissed a claim brought by the parents of a student with a nut allergy alleging that the school district’s refusal to provide the student with a nut free environment at school was an actionable threat of violence or harm under the state’s civil code. The court concluded that none of the alleged statements by school officials regarding their refusal or inability to create a nut free environment in the school would be perceived by a reasonable person as threats of violence against the student.

Only in California.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/adjunctprofs/2011/07/school-districts-refusal-to-provide-allegric-student-with-a-nut-free-environment-did-not-constitute-an-actionable-threat-o.html

Education Law | Permalink

Comments

Wow! So wonderful, I like it, thanks for sharing this with us. Congratulations! You have the wonderful writing & presenting skills. I am hoping in future same work from you.
Thanks once again.

Posted by: kishore tyagi | Jul 21, 2011 2:51:21 AM

typo in header-should be allergic, not allegric.

Posted by: adadhahah | Aug 3, 2011 2:45:28 PM

Post a comment