« Injunction of state rule requiring pharmacists to fill drugs was overbroad | Main | Co-worker with different supervisor is appropriate comparator under Title VII »
July 14, 2009
7thCir: No ADA claim for physician fired for making threats of physical violence
Sometimes you just cannot make these cases up. Bodenstab v Cook County, ___F.3d___(7th Cir. June 22, 2009), is one such case. The 7th held that a hospital did not violate the ADA when it discharged an
anesthesiologist who allegedly threatened to kill his supervisor and
coworkers. The 7th concluded that the physician failed to
present sufficient evidence of pretext for his claim to survive summary
judgment. Without deciding whether “interacting with others” qualified
as a major life activity — or, if it did, whether he was so
substantially limited — the appeals court determined the physician did
not present any evidence calling into question the sincerity of the
county’s belief that he had threatened to harm his supervisor and
coworkers and that the county fired him for that reason. Rather, the
undisputed evidence supported the county’s belief that he made the
threats. In so holding, the Seventh Circuit did not decide whether the
physician presented a direct threat to others because even if the
county could establish its burden, summary judgment was nonetheless
appropriate on the discharge claim. Moreover, the physician was not
entitled to a reasonable accommodation. “There is no legal obligation
to ‘accommodate’ conduct, as opposed to a disability.”
Mitchell H. Rubinstein
July 14, 2009 in Discrimination Law | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef0115718cd1c3970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 7thCir: No ADA claim for physician fired for making threats of physical violence:
Comments
similarly, there's a phys-ed teacher with a mental disability who was legally fired for threatening to kill students playing basketball; Macy v. Hopkins County School Board (6th Cir. 2007) at http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/07a0133p-06.pdf
Posted by: kent | Jul 14, 2009 8:01:03 PM