« Employer Vicarious Liability For Sexual Harassment | Main | Alabama Employment Lawyer Nominated to the EEOC »

April 13, 2008

Constructive Notice Under FMLA

Family, Medical Leave Act: Constructive Notice for Leave is an interesting March 26, 2008 New York Law Journal article by Dean L. Sliverberg and Melissa Beekman. This article discusses the Oct. 7, 2998 Seventh Circuit decision in Stevenson v. Hyre Electric Co., which held that although an employee may not have given direct notice for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), she may have provided constructive notice of her need for FMLA by her unusual workplace behavior, apparently precipitated by a stray dog in the office. The authors conclude:

This decision will probably have large implications for employers by forcing them to seriously scrutinize the circumstances surrounding an employee's absence when considering whether the FMLA, along with its attendant rights and obligations, are triggered.

It is hard to argue with the rational of the court. The FMLA notice requirements are not complex. No magic words are needed. When an otherwise good employee transforms virtually over night and has bizzare behaviors at work, it might be obivious that something is wrong and the employee is in need of leave. On the other hand, are employers expected to have a crystal ball where they can read into the employee's medical or personal problems?    

This is a case of first impression that appears ripe for law review commentary.

Mitchell H. Rubinstein

April 13, 2008 in FMLA, Law Review Ideas | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfae553ef00e5517789308833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Constructive Notice Under FMLA:

Comments

For an earlier bizarre-behavior-as-FMLA-request case, see Byrne v. Avon Products (7th Cir. 2003) no. 02-2629 ("It would be silly to require the unconscious worker to inform the employer verbally or in writing. Unusual behavior gives all the notice required.") briefed at http://www.lawroom.com/story.asp?STID=852 online.

Posted by: kent | Apr 14, 2008 6:49:43 PM

Post a comment