Thursday, April 22, 2010
We have seven class days left. I am meeting lots of students who are brand new to my ASP services. These students are usually panicky. For the most part, they are extremely behind. We are talking no outlines or, best case, last outlined in Week 4 of the semester. If I am lucky, they have at least been reading for class (though usually not briefing).
Welcome to ASP triage work. I want to ask "What were you thinking?" I don't. First of all, we do not have the time right now for that discussion. Second, I do not want to risk sending them "over the edge" and flat-lining any chances we have of fixing the situation to some extent.
Here are a few of the emergency measures that I suggest to them:
- Make every minute count. Do not waste time. Only undertake studying that gets results. Always consider what the payback will be for the exam (or paper or project) when starting a task.
- Keep up with current class reading. Many students are tempted to stop reading for class to find more study time. This strategy is a bad idea because then they are then lost on the current material which will also be on the exam.
- Continue going to all classes. Many students are also tempted to skip class to find more study time. This strategy does not work because the professor will now be pulling the course material together, will give out information about the exam, and will test on the new material.
- Develop a structured time management schedule. Block out times for the week when reading for class, writing any papers, and reviewing for exams will occur. Label each block with the course related to the task. Spread the time for exam review among all exam courses so that progress can be made on every one of them. Few people can work more than a few hours on a paper at one time. Use breaks from a paper for reading or reviewing for exams.
- Prioritize your courses and topics within courses. Some of the things to consider are:
- Determine the level of understanding in each course.
- Determine the amount of material to learn for the first time in each course.
- Determine the amount of material already reviewed for each course.
- Evaluate which topics are most likely to be heavily tested, moderately tested, and slightly tested for each exam.
- Determine whether course topics need to be studied chronologically as presented (because they build on one another) or can be isolated for study in any order.
- Check to see the order of your exams within the exam period.
After we avert this crisis as much as possible, we have the "next semester" conversation about using sound study habits from the first day of the semester. (Amy Jarmon)
Wednesday, April 21, 2010
Some interesting science to report...at least one presenter at every ASP conference mentions that students feel that red pen makes it look as if the paper is "bleeding" negative comments. A new spin: teachers actually grade more harshly when using red pen. Another reason why green, pink, purple might be better bets when giving student feedback.
(I realize this link doesn't look like it fits with my post...it does.)
And a link to the full study is here:
The pen is mightier than the word: Object priming of evaluative standards
by Rutchick, Slepian, and Ferris
Monday, April 19, 2010
When I discuss exam writing with students, I have noticed that mentioning the possibility of "policy points" usually elicits some concern. I often get a glazed stare, a deer-in-the-headlights look, or a furrowed brow in response. Over the years, I have decided that these responses come from several sources.
What does "policy" mean? For some students, the responses are based on the peculiar fact that faculty members talk about policy readily without ever actually explaining the term. As lawyers, we all know what it means, but do not connect with the fact that students (especially 1L's) do not. Once students realize that "policy" is the purpose behind a law, a light bulb goes on for them.
They relax once they understand that courts may use policy discussion to reason through (some would say justify) law in new areas or changes to the existing common law. It will make sense to them that attorneys may argue policy to convince a court to alter the existing law to a small degree. It suddenly becomes obvious that legislatures may use policy reasons for enacting a law that impacts society in a new way.
Why should I care about it? Professors often enjoy the discussions of policy that accompany their courses. If they are "idea" people, they may even get a "buzz" from discoursing on policy implications. Some courses (or at least topics within courses) are traditionally taught with lots of policy discussion.
Students who are intuitive learners tend to understand innately policy's important place in legal thinking. They like dealing with concepts, abstractions, and theories. They see the inter-relationships among various policies and how to use those policies to further their arguments.
However, students who are sensing learners do not always understand why policy should be important. These learners are very practical people who hone in on facts and details and direct applications to problems. They may only pay attention to policy if they see how policy impacts the law. If a professor merely discusses policy on a very theoretical basis without actual examples of its use, these students may miss the point entirely. They need more information: How can the plaintiff's or defendant's attorney argue this policy? Would the parties choose different arguments based on competing policy choices? How have policy changes actually altered the law over time?
Will my professor care about policy? It depends. Some courses are so codified that policy has become relatively unimportant; there may be little or no policy discussed by the professor. Some professors will relate the historical policy discussions as background, but see them as unimportant for exams. Some professors will ask pure policy questions on their exams.
I can think of two professors who taught the same topics from the same case book, but had totally different expectations for final exam answers. One professor expected policy discussion on every question while the other was uninterested in policy discussion unless it was the only argument a party could make. "Know thy professor" is the best tack to take for determining the potential for policy points on exam answers.
When I get one of the looks of concern, I explore the student's reaction to see if one of these aspects is the reason. We then discuss further whether or not policy points are an appropriate strategy. (Amy Jarmon)
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Some law students have been studying for exams all semester by staying on top of their course reading, adding to their outlines each week, and conscientiously learning new material while reviewing past material. In truth, this ongoing process is the key to the highest grades because deeper understanding and long-term memory result.
However, most students are only now beginning to think about exam study. Depending on the school, they are 6 - 8 weeks out from exams. For many, they will be on the "downward slope" when they return from Spring Break.
There are four kinds of review that students need to accomplish as they study for exams. If all four kinds are included in their study plans, they are more likely to master their courses and garner better grades.
First, one needs to learn intensely each topic. This type of study has deep understanding as its goal. It is the "could walk into the exam on Friday" kind of learning. It may take several study sessions to reach this level of learning for a long topic that was covered over multiple class sessions. Intense learning may need to include additional reading in study aids or time asking the professor questions in order to clear up all confusion and master the material. In addition to learning this one part of the course, the student should consider how it relates to the course as a whole.
Second, one needs to keep fresh everything in the course. This type of study is focused on reading one's outline cover to cover at least once a week. It makes sure that the law student never gets so far away from a topic that it gets "foggy." Students forget 80% of what they learn within two weeks if they do not review regularly. After intensely learning a topic, it would be a shame to forget it. Constant review reinforces long-term memory and provides for quicker recall when the material is needed.
Third, one needs to spend time on basic memory drills. This type of study helps a student remember the precise rule, the definition of an element, or the steps of analysis. For most students, these drills will be done with homemade flashcards. Some students will write out rules multiple times. Other students will develop mnemonics. Still others may have visual reminders. The "grunt work" of memory can be tedious. However, if one does not know the law well, one will not do well on the exam.
Fourth, one needs to complete as many practice questions as possible. This step has several advantages. It monitors whether one has really understood the law. It tests whether one can apply the law to new fact scenarios. It allows one to practice test-taking strategies. And it monitors whether one needs to repeat intense learning on a topic or sub-topic because errors on the questions indicate that it was obviously not learned to the level needed.
Ideally students need to set aside blocks of study time to accomplish each of these reviews every week for every course. The proportion of time for each course will depend on the amount of material covered, the difficulty of the course for the student, and the type of exam. (Amy Jarmon)
Friday, December 11, 2009
You may be wondering why a posting under the category "Exams - Studying" would be about movies. No, I am not going to suggest that students watch Paper Chase or Presumed Innocent. Instead, I am strongly encouraging them all to purchase a ticket to the local cinema.
During law school, I saw more movies than any other time in my life. Why did I watch so many movies? Here are my reasons:
- It is impossible to sit in a movie theater and worry about law school. The plot catches up every thought and catapults the viewer into another world and other lives.
- Unlike a DVD or Movie on Demand at home, there is no pile of books on a desk in one's line of vision to beckon one back to studying. The guilt factor disappears because one is out of the study milieu.
- Movies reminded me that law school was not the "real world" for most people. Movies allowed me to retreat from the fish bowl of law school and be an ordinary citizen again.
- Although my favorites were comedies (because they made me laugh) and children's films (because they depended on imagination and not critical thinking), other genres can equally allow healthy escapism. I would not recommend a law-related plot, however, because it defeats the purpose of going to the movies.
Most movies allow for approximately 2 hours of total diversion when one relaxes completely instead of stressing about memos, papers, or exams. Enough time to relax, but not so much time as to waste an entire day.
So, here is to the matinee ticket - cheap and cheerful! Give your brain cells a break. Relax completely, and then go back to the books refreshed. (Amy Jarmon)
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Most of my law students realize that the carefree days of undergraduate Thanksgiving breaks from class are no longer possible. Unless law students have been diligent in reviewing for exams all semester (fortunately, more of my students are seeing the benefits of this strategy), they will not be able to afford 5 days away from the books. Even my diligent students often want the extra review time.
Students who have a study plan before the break begins tend to get more accomplished than those students who "take it day by day." By planning, they waste less time trying to decide what to study and getting started on their studying. They are also less susceptible to the temptations of TV, shopping, non-law-school family members' relaxing, and frittering away time.
Each day basically has three potential study chunks within it: 8-12, 1-5, 6-10. For many students, thinking about the day in thirds helps them plan their studying realistically. It is easier to estimate what can be done in 4 hours than what can be done "today." Even if a student decides to not use all three potential chunks every day, it allows conscious decisions about each part rather than drifting through the day.
For each chunk, a student has to determine how to use the time most effectively for her study habits and learning styles. One student may want to spend all of the day's time (a potential 12 hours) on one subject for review. Another student may need to switch off courses to stay focused. Within each of the three chunks, one student may "mix it up": read through an entire outline, flashcards, intense studying of one topic, practice problems, reading a supplement, making graphic organizers for the material. Another student may focus better by completing one type of task the entire time.
Students will maintain their focus best, gain greater understanding, and retain more information if they are active in their studying. Some may read out loud. Some may recite rules out loud. Some may ask lots of questions while reviewing the material. Some may even pace while doing flashcards. Being actively involved is more effective than merely "doing time" over the books.
Within the longer chunks, students should take short breaks roughly every 90 minutes. A quick trip to the refrigerator for a drink, a snack, or a brief chat with family will allow one's brain to file the recently completed information.
Family circumstances vary. Some students can hole up in their rooms without causing a problem with their family. Other students will find that it is best to go to the public library, coffeehouse, or some other location to study because their family members interrupt them too much or resent "tip-toeing" around the house so the law student can study.
However, I always encourage my students whether they are here in town to study or at home with family and friends to take most, if not all, of the actual holiday itself off. Why? Because otherwise they are miserable. They feel sorry for themselves and resent not having the holiday. So, better to have some time off and enjoy it than to not focus on what they are trying to study because of their emotional response. If they are staying in town, I encourage them to join with other law students or folks they know in the community for a dinner. At minimum they should go out to a restaurant and have a nice meal. Peanut butter and jelly or turkey sandwiches are not the same as a good holiday meal.
And, I think it is helpful if the students have a reward planned for studying each day. Being able to look forward to the reward is a motivator. Claiming the reward at the end of the day is satisfaction for a job well done. Whether it is watching TV with family, going to a movie, playing Spider Solitaire, or a bubble bath, the reward will make the day a success.
Happy Thanksgiving to all ASPers and to all our law students. (Amy Jarmon)
Thursday, November 19, 2009
All law students are into exam study mode right now. However, I want to address non-traditional students and specific study issues that they bring to the "crunch time" of the semester.
Unlike many of their colleagues, they are often juggling partners and/or children in the law school mix. If they are attending part-time/evening programs, they are further juggling work deadlines and boss expectations as well. Some of them also add community or family obligations such as care of elderly or ill parents.
Here are some tips to help "non-trads" get more study time:
- Discuss with your family why this period in the semester is so important. Your family may not understand since law school is so foreign to everyone who has not attended - especially if you never disappeared like this during other degree programs.
- Ask for help in trying to find blocks of time when you can have uninterrupted study time.
- Agree on family time that you will participate in to stay connected with "real life": a regular dinner hour or story time before bed might be examples.
- Agree on what chores and other responsibilities will be kept by you and what ones your family can pick up (or what chores can be temporarily jettisoned).
- Go to the law school or some other location to study so that family knows that when you are home you are available.
- One family had a red light-green light system for the study/office door. If the law student could not be interrupted, the red light signaled that status. The green light meant short interruptions were okay.
- Post your study schedule on the refrigerator to let everyone know when you will be studying and when there will be down time.
- Consider what chores can be jettisoned or trimmed (example, an extreme clean may not happen each week).
- Consider whether separate home-cooked meals every night can be replaced with crock-pot-cooked meals on the weekend that are frozen and recycled over several weeks.
- Consider whether some activities can be trimmed down a bit in time so that extra half-hour slots can be accumulated into a larger study block during the day (example, meal time, bath time, story time).
- Decide whether you are using time between classes during the day to greatest advantage so that you can shift some studying prior to when your children arrive home.
- Decide whether set meal, nap, bath, and bed times would help both you and your children have a better routine.
- Can you take vacation or personal days to gain more study time?
- Can you work on flex-time so that you shift your hours for several weeks to allow more study time?
- Will your boss agree to your studying at the office if your job duties are slow?
- Can you swap duties/deadlines for the next several weeks with other co-workers in return for repaying the favor later?
- Are there projects or tasks that can be delayed until after exams?
Non-trads have some special responsibilities that can be managed within the exigencies of law school with some extra planning. Fortunately, most of them have fairly good time and work management skills from their jobs and family duties. However, communication with loved ones and work colleagues goes a long way in making the transition to law school studying a smooth one. (Amy Jarmon)
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Now that we are approaching the final crunch before exams, I try to help my law students find ways that they can save time on some of their tasks at school and at home.
Here are some hints that seem to ease the stress because of greater efficiency and effectiveness on school tasks:
- Read actively now for learning rather than highlighting material to learn later.
- Review regularly so that you do not need to relearn as much.
- Review your readings/briefs before you go into class.
- Review your class notes within 24 hours for better understanding. Condense them in anticipation of outlining later.
- Review your outline cover to cover regularly in addition to any specific topics you are learning.
- Should you study at school, another academic building, a coffeehouse, or at home to avoid distractions?
- Should you study one subject for a longer period (2-4 hours) or switch among subjects to keep focused?
- Should you cut back on hours at your job to make studying a priority?
- Should you lessen the time you spend on e-mailing, instant messaging, texting, and talking on the phone?
Here are some hints that seem to ease the stress because of greater efficiency and effectiveness on home tasks:
- Minimize your time spent on cleaning by scheduling a major cleaning session now and then picking up and spot cleaning only through the end of exams.
- Plan your errands so that you have scheduled blocks of time twice a week; place errands in the same part of town in the same time block.
- Run your errands in "off peak" times whenever possible to avoid lines. Since many stores stay open late or 24 hours, you do not have to shop at the same time as most people.
- Stock up on food supplies that have a long shelf life to avoid multiple grocery trips later.
- Buy "family size" portions of prepared foods even if you live alone so that you will have multiple meals taken care of at once. Freeze unused portions for later if you desire more variety within a week's menu.
- Complete as much food prep as possible on the weekend for the entire week. Cut up fresh fruit or vegetables to be portioned out over the week. Cook multiple servings of a recipe in the crock-pot to use during the week without extra food prep (or to freeze and thaw for greater variety later). Make sandwiches ahead for several days.
- Trade off child care with other law students so that each law school student can have blocks of uninterrupted time for study.
- Talk to family and friends about how important this period in the semester is to your success. Ask for them to help you have concentrated periods of study until exams are over.
By taking control over daily tasks that are not high priority, law students can minimize their stress and focus more on their study priorities. Saving even 1/2 hour per day means 3 1/2 extra hours per week to study for exams. (Amy Jarmon)
Thursday, November 12, 2009
I must admit that at times I grow weary battling the misinformation about exam studying that stays alive and well on our law school grapevine. So much of the advice throws water in the face of memory and learning theories.
Students need to remember that they must allow time for four types of exam studying for each course each week if they want to achieve high grades:
- cover-to-cover review of their outlines to keep everything fresh;
- intense review of material that they still need to learn;
- memory drills of the essential black letter law; and
- practice questions to apply the law.
Misinformation #1: Cramming works.
We forget 80% of what we learn if we do not review it regularly. Thus, the law student who waits until 4-6 weeks (or less) from exams to learn everything for the semester is really re-learning material. Not very efficient.
Also, the same student will at best be using working memory (previously called short-term memory) rather than long-term memory. Working memory is like one's desk top. Long-term memory is like one's filing cabinet. Working memory means that the person will likely only retain it long enough for the exam. Not very helpful for bar review or future client discussions.
Misinformation #2: Shirking on reading and briefing allows for more study time.
It is as if these students forget that the new material will also be on the exam. If one skims cases (or worse does not read them at all) and skips briefs, one is not going to know the material deeply. Professors do not discuss everything in class that may be valuable for the exam. This is not undergraduate school where class is all one needs to do well.
Deep understanding of material allows students to think and write like lawyers. By understanding the nuances of the law, students can better analyze questions and make arguments.
Misinformation #3: Memorizing the black letter law is all you need.
The black letter law is the minimal foundation needed when someone goes into an exam. However, the good grades go to those students who can apply the law to new fact scenarios. The memorized law is merely the toolbox that students use to work on solving legal problems.
In the past when I have asked professors what grade a student who merely knows the black letter law will get on their exams, the answers have ranged from some kind of "C" to some kind of "D."
Misinformation #4: Working with your study group can get you through the exams.
Study groups can be very helpful for clarifying material, getting to the big picture, seeing a practice question from different perspectives, and other purposes. Alas, a student is not able to depend on the study group in the exam itself.
Each student has to balance group time with enough individual hard work. Unless the individual student understands the material deeply and is prepared to analyze the scenario and write a concise and cogent essay answer (or carefully choose among answer options in multiple-choice), the game is lost.
Misinformation #5: Waiting until exam period to do practice questions is best.
Ideally one wants to complete practice questions at the end of every topic (and in some cases, sub-topic) throughout the semester. Then as one reviews for the exams, one completes more questions. During the exam period, one is then ready for even harder questions rather than just getting started. Also, students who complete many questions are ready to complete questions under timed conditions long before others can do so.
Practice questions for essay exams are essential because they not only help one spot issues and apply the law but also help one practice the approach to questions and strategies for exam writing. The sooner one works on all of these skills and strategies, the greater the chance of success on exam day. It is all good and well to know what "IRAC" means but an entirely different thing to do it well.
Practice questions for multiple-choice exams are also essential because they too allow practice of both skills and strategies. Because multiple-choice questions are usually "best answer" format, lots of practice trains one in seeing the nuances that make one answer better than another.
Misinformation #6: Studying each course for two or more weeks and then ignoring it until later works best.
If one focuses on one course for a long period and then moves on to another course (for example, two weeks on civil procedure, two weeks on contracts, etc.), it is a recipe for disaster. A variation that you start with your last exam for two weeks, then your middle exam, etc. is equally wrong-headed. These methods ignore how memory works.
As mentioned above, we forget 80% of what we learn if we do not review it regularly. Also, as mentioned, long-term memory works to greater advantage on exams. By using the four types of review mentioned in the beginning of this posting for each course each week, memory will benefit.
One would think that merely 1L students would fall for these poorly conceived study misinformations on the grapevine. Surprisingly, 2Ls and 3Ls hang on to grapevine misinformation even when it has not worked for them in the past! When I explain the reasons why the misinformation is wrong, most students immediately choose better strategies. (Amy Jarmon)
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Law students may find that providing themselves rewards for task completion during final assignments and exam studying will keep them motivated. Students should match the reward to the accomplishment: large rewards for large tasks completed; medium rewards for medium tasks completed; and small rewards for small tasks completed.
Students can determine their own definitions of large, medium and small tasks depending on difficulty of course material, type of assignment, and length of the paper. In addition, students will differ as to the content of the motivators depending on their own tastes and lifestyles.
Here are some ideas to help students generate their own rewards lists:
- Ice cream for dessert
- Chai latte on the way to school
- Popcorn snack mid-afternoon
- Chat in the student lounge for 10 minutes
- Sit outside and work on one's tan for 10 minutes
- Check e-mail for 10 minutes
- Walk around campus for 10 minutes
- Watching a 1/2 hour sitcom.
- Phoning a friend for 30 minutes.
- Lunch with a friend in the student lounge
- Video games for 30 minutes
- Free cell for 30 minutes
- Playing Frisbee with the family dog
- Reading a story to a child
- Lunch or dinner at a restaurant
- Going to the cinema
- Reading the Sunday paper cover to cover
- Reading a novel for several hours
- Taking a drive in the countryside
- Buying a new cookbook
- Taking one's children to the park
The rewards are only limited by the law student's imagination and finances. By having something to look forward to, it is easier to persevere and finish a task. (Amy Jarmon)
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Exams start here in 21 days, so the stress level is increasing by the minute. Many of my students are handling their stress well, but some have become so stressed that they are not able to get a perspective on how to help themselves.
Students sometimes think their stress comes only from studying itself, but stress can also come from friends, family, and personal responsibilities. By dealing with both the law and non-law stress, students can cope more effectively.
The following list of stress busters should help students who are looking for quick and easy solutions for decreasing their stress:
- Tackle your most onerous task for the day as early as possible in your schedule. That way, it won't "hang over" you all day long and add to your stress.
- Tackle your hardest study tasks when you are most alert. Your brain will absorb material more easily for greater understanding and retention. Consequently, you will feel better about your study session and lower your stress.
- Decide whether you study better for exams by focusing on one subject or several subjects per day. Some students need the variety to stay focused. By working with your own style, you will be less stressed than trying to study the way your friends study.
- Read through your outlines cover to cover each week in addition to any specific topics you are studying. By keeping all of the material fresh, you will feel less anxious about forgetting things.
- Take short breaks (5-10 minutes) every 90 minutes and longer breaks every 4 hours (45 minutes). Your brain will keep filing information while you relax. You will stay more focused by allowing some down time to de-stress.
- Explain to your family and non-law friends why you need to focus on preparing for exams. Schedule some fun activities for after exams so they know you will make it up to them after this last push. If you do not feel guilty about family and friends, you will be less stressed.
- Exercise for 30 minutes at least 2-3 times per week. You may not have time for your usual long workout at the gym. However, taking time to go for a walk or jog will help defuse stress.
- Eat three balanced meals a day. Resorting to junk food deprives your brain of much needed fuel and contributes to stress. Cook large quantities over the weekend or in a crock pot so that you have meals for the week.
- Avoid caffeine overloads, including energy drinks. High doses of caffeine can have serious health side effects: increased blood pressure, panic attacks, increased anxiety, insomnia, and more. Drink ice water instead.
- Avoid sugar highs and crashes from too many candy bars and sodas. Too much sugar will add to irritability which will cause you to feel stressed.
- Get a minimum of 7 hours of sleep per night. Shirking on sleep means your brain cells do not work as well, your productivity goes down, and your ability to cope with stress decreases.
- Stock up on all of your exam essentials now: pens, pencils, ink cartridges, healthy snacks, healthy beverages, foods with long shelf life. Fewer errands to run as exams approach will lower your stress.
- Complete a "whirling dervish" clean of your apartment now. Then just pick up and spot clean for the remaining weeks. Finding time for major chores every week can be very stressful.
- Switch to low-maintenance clothing so that you have less ironing to do and fewer dry cleaning trips to fit in to your schedule. Again, one less chore to worry about will lower your stress.
By adding even one or two stress busters, students can increase their coping skills as the semester winds down and the stress winds up. (Amy Jarmon)
Thursday, April 2, 2009
As the exam period is getting closer, more students are telling me that they are having difficulty studying at the law school. Stress seems to be in the very air that students breathe. Some students are irritable and taking it out on others. Some students are predicting gloom and doom. Rumors about professors' past exams or grading curves are on the increase.
Law students need to escape negative vibes in order to keep their focus and lower their own stress levels. For some students, their apartments are not good options because of distractions such as television, the bed, or video games.
Here are some places that law students can consider for studying if they need to escape the law school but cannot go home:
- Other academic classroom buildings on campus.
- The main university library on campus.
- Meeting rooms in the university Student Union.
- The business conference room or other areas in their apartment complex clubhouse.
- Sunday School classrooms at their church (with permission of the church staff).
- Coffee houses, fast-food restaurants, or 24-hour restaurants (with purchase every few hours and a big tip for the wait staff).
- The branch locations for the public library.
Some students will find that changing locations every few days will help them stay motivated and focused. Others will thrive on a routine and prefer to go to the same location regularly. (Amy Jarmon)
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
This week is four weeks before exams for my students. A number of them have spoken to me about their feelings of being overwhelmed. Our calendar changed this year, and 2L and 3L students were bit surprised to realize that exams start earlier than usual.
I have been working with many students on strategies to get control of exam studying rather than letting it control them. A Chinese proverb seems appropriate: You can eat an elephant one bite at a time. Depending on a student's difficulty with a course, we may be talking about a baby elephant, an adult elephant, or a legendary elephant of massive proportion.
Four types of review are needed each week for each course throughout the remainder of the semester: intense review of subtopics, cover to cover outline review, memory drills, and practice questions.
- "Intense review" is accomplished through the subtopic lists described in the steps below and prepares students to know the material as if the exam were tomorrow.
- "Cover to cover outline review" is reading through the entire outline at least once each week for each course. This type of review keeps everything fresh in memory and will take relatively little additional time each week.
- "Memory drills" are for those rules and elements that still need to be learned more precisely. The additional time needed will depend on the course and the student's adeptness at memorization.
- "Practice questions" should be done a day or two after the intense review to see if one really understood the material and can apply it. Most students need 1-2 hours per course each week for this task.
Here are the steps that I suggest they use to gain control through the "intense review" process:
Make a list of every topic with all of the subtopics to be studied for the final exam.. Each coure should have its own sheet of paper for this step. The subtopics are the critical pieces in this scheme. Number all of the subtopics down the list. If the student has a syllabus for the whole semester, then the entire list will be numbered. If a professor gives out the syllabus in pieces, then more topics/subtopics may need to be added later and the numbering continued.
For each subtopic that has already been covered in class, write down an estimate of the amount of time needed to know the material for the exam. Some subtopics that are already understood may only take 15 more minutes. Others may need 30 minutes, 45 minutes, 1 hour or more. If the estimate is a range (1 - 1 1/2 hours), then always choose the higher time. It is better to have more time than too little time estimated. Estimates will be added for new subtopics as they are covered in class.
Total the amount of time needed for each course for all of the subtopics so far. This total gives a student a realistic idea of the intense review time needed for the course up to this point in time. Courses will vary in the amount of time because of the amount of material covered and the difficulty of that material for a student. The total will increase as estimates are added for new subtopics covered in class.
Decide regular hours that can be used for each course for exam study time. Students who use structured weekly time management schedules will find this step very easy because their routinized study schedule already shows blocks of time that are open. For students who have not been structured, this is a good time to become more structured so that each week's schedule becomes more routine and predictable. For this step, a student might decide that she can spend 3-5 every Monday and 2-4 every Saturday on intense Property review, every Tuesday 8 - 10 and every Sunday 3-5 on intense Crim Law review, and every Saturday 9-12 and 7-9 on Con Law intense review.
Use monthly calendars to scheulde subtopics for the regular exam study times for each course. Now pencil in the subtopic numbers for each course that will be completed during those regular times. Every Monday 3-5 will have Property subtopic numbers as will every Saturday 2-4 (3/28 P1-4, 3/30 P5-7 etc.). Frontload the subtopics for the material already covered because new material subtopics will be studied as they are covered.
As a subtopic is completed, visually indicate on the list that the intense review is finished. Some students like to use highlighters; some students like to draw a line through the subtopic. The idea is for the student to see her progress as she conquers the list.
The goal is to have all subtopics except the last 1 or 2 weeks of new material ready for the exam by the last day of classes. Students will be less stressed about exams, feel more confident about the material, and have less to learn during the exam period this way. (Amy Jarmon)
Monday, March 23, 2009
A number of law students spent their Spring Breaks catching up on outlining for each course and beginning to review specific topics for exams. Some students will have lengthy outlines that include a great deal of detail (probably over 60 pages with 6 weeks to go still).
Students who are prone to making lengthy "monster" outlines are often insecure about what they can safely leave out of the outlines. Part of this dilemma may be a misunderstanding as to the purpose of the outlines. Some students believe that course outlines need everything included because they will depend on them to study for the bar or to remember the law once in practice.
The purpose of a course outline is to manage information and to pass the final exam. When it comes time to study for the bar exam, the bar review course will provide an enormous box of books with "everything you need to know for the bar exam." Few students actually use any course outlines to study for the bar because 1) no professor can cover every topic that may be on the bar; 2) a law school course may have been too specific or not specific enough about state law, common law, or a uniform code; and 3) the law may have changed by the time one graduates. Recent graduates tend to keep their bar review course outlines hidden in a desk drawer at work (rather than their personal outlines) for those anxious first months as a new lawyer. After that time period, neither resource is used because they have "graduated" to other library resources that are state-specific or more updated as well as a personal foundation in their practice areas.
Another reason students may have lengthy outlines with too much detail is that they are sequential-sensing learners who learn first through the parts, facts and details. Only after they are comfortable with these stages can they begin to seek the bigger picture of a course. However, they need to get to that overview with an understanding of the inter-relationships among the parts in order to succeed on their exams. If they stay bogged down in details, they may miss issues, write about phantom issues, and run out of time on exams.
It is more efficient to condense class notes and briefs before they are put into an outline. That way the outline contains the essentials in a topic and sub-topic format rather than bogging down in details of cases. Also, it takes less time to construct the outline if it is pre-condensed, so to speak. However, this type of condensation is often easier for 2L and 3L sequential-sensing learners because they have more experience of what is unnecessary for exams.
Assuming that one is not able to let go of the details for the first outline stage, let's consider how to condense it afterwards. Whether you will have an open-book exam where your outline is allowed or a closed-book exam where you have done extensive memorization, there is no time in an exam to leaf through a monster outline to find something - whether the leafing is done mentally or in real time. Thus, one wants to have as few outline pages to consider as possible.
Someone once described the process of condensing outlines to me as a family tree. The long first version is MASTER OUTLINE. It should then be condensed to Son of Outline (approximately half the original size), then Grandson of Outline (half the size of the second version), Great-Grandson of Outline (5 - 10 pages at the most), and Great-Great-Grandson (the front and back of a sheet of paper).
If memorized for a closed book exam, the one-pager is written on scrap paper as soon as the proctor says "begin." It acts as a checklist for all exam answers. (For the open book exam, it goes on top of the outline.) The Great-Grandson of Outline is the next mental outline stage to think through for a missing rule or step of analysis. One works back mentally through the versions if one needs more depth of information. (In the open-book exam, the outlines are arranged from shortest to longest in a binder.)
I have never had a student tell me that she had time to go back further or needed more detail than Son of Outline during the exam. And, many students admit that everything they needed was in the Great-Grandson of Outline. Thus, staying tied to the monster outline is inefficient in the end.
Although a student may still start with the monster outline, it should be condensed in stages as indicated as one learns each section. The most successful students will study the outline throughout the semester (or the remainder of the semester for those who have just started) and condense old material as they add new topics. Thus, the outline will shrink and expand simultaneously until the final versions are produced.
If your students are skeptical that these methods will work, have them go back after their exams and highlight anything that they actually used in the monster outline on the exam. They should then evaluate how much information they slaved over including that was ultimately unnecessary. This exercise should help them learn what is essential for an outline and what is unnecessary. (Amy Jarmon)
Monday, February 9, 2009
About this time of year, I hear a lot of students complain that they can not get through the reading each night. They drift off, they are distracted, they can't follow the arguments. This is not an unusual phenomena; law school reading is difficult, requires intense mental effort, and sometimes, it's just boring. Not every case is going to be personally interesting to all students; literature majors don't expect every book they are assigned to be spellbinding, and law students should not expect every case to be compelling. One of the toughest messages for students to hear is that lack of concentration has no magic solution. There is no fairy dusk I can sprinkle on their case books to make the cases more exciting, nor do I have a potion that will help them concentrate when they are studying late at night. I do, however, have a set of behavioral changes that I suggest to increase concentration and retention of the material:
1) Reading: Start with your least favorite subject when you are most alert. If you find Civ Pro (or Torts, Criminal Law, Constitutional Law, Property, etc etc etc) to be the dullest subject, read it first; otherwise, you will put it off and it will be even more dreadful when you are reading it while you are only 1/2 awake.
2) Schedule breaks into your reading. Even if you get into a "flow" state, you need to take a break to get the blood pumping and to give your brain a rest. Break does not mean two hours of video games; a break is a trip to the bathroom, a snack, or one game of spider solitaire.
3) Find your optimal studying environment. Everyone has a different optimal study environment; for some people it is a quiet coral in the library silent study area, but for others, it is in their bedroom at home with classical music playing.
4) Your parents were right: save the fun and games until after the homework is done, or you will never get to it. That doesn't mean don't take a break after a day of classes; a break is good for you if you have been thinking all day. Go running, take a short nap. But if you start watching hours of television, playing video games, or finding other methods of procrastination in the name of "break time" you are going to find it very hard to switch gears and read.
5) If you absolutely can not read a word on the page, take a break and come back to it after you have napped, eaten, or done whatever you need to do in order to focus.
None of my suggestions are groundbreaking; all the student have heard them before at different points in their life. But they are suggestions that are easy to hear and hard to implement; they require the discipline and commitment that many students are lacking now that grades have come out and they are burnt out of the law school experience. It is only in very rare cases that the lack of concentration signals a bigger problem, like a learning disability or ADHD. As a mentioned in my post last week, students need to forgive themselves and give themselves extra time. They are exhausted, and that is to be expected at this time of the year. But there is a line between exhaustion and lack of effort that is easy to cross and hard to come back from. But concentration doesn't come in a magic potion.
Wednesday, November 12, 2008
As students are gearing up for finals, I have received a number of requests, and corresponding reviews, of help for students who are not predominantly read/write learners. Here are a couple of my suggestions for these students that have received positive reviews from their peers:
For aural learners: The Gilbert's Legends Series and the Sum and Substance Audio Series. One of the neat suggestions a students gave me was to "talk back" to the CD's, and turn the listening experience into an argument, or discussion. When something on the CD is confusing or leads to an ephiphany, stop the CD and talk to yourself about it. Ask questions of the material, like a dialogue with the CD. Students often have the answer to their own questions, but need something to spark their understanding. A caveat for law students reading this post--these CD's are NOT a replacement for class, but a chance to review and condense the material.
For visual learners: Inspiration software. For students who like to create diagrams, mind maps, and charts, Inspiration turns traditional outlines into these visual learning tools, and can change visual tools into a traditional outline. The Inspiration software has a free 30-day trial. Attached is my intentional tort chart, created with Inspiration software; you may need to load the Inspiration software on your computer to see the chart Download intentional_torts.isf
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
It is the last week of classes here at Texas Tech School of Law. 3L students are counting down in minutes now. 2L students are anticipating summer jobs while still worrying about exams. And, 1L students are surprised at how fast the semester went.
The 3L students have commented on how difficult it is to concentrate on this last set of exams. Some have frankly told me that all they want is C grades. 3L students often state their stressors in terms beyond law school: chasing their outstanding job possibilities, planning for their move to a new job, finding housing in their new city, or worrying about the bar exam.
For these students, I often suggest that they become list makers. By making task lists, they can see the progress that they have made on finalizing their plans as each task is crossed off the list. For those stressed by decisions about which job to accept, which city to move to in hopes of a job, or which house is the best to buy, I talk about making tallies of the pros and cons for each option. For those worried about their studying for the bar, I recommend Pass the Bar! by Denise Riebe and Michael Hunter Schwartz. Once they have a plan of attack for these future concerns, I bring their attention back to planning for exam studying.
Despite their summer plans, the 2L students are very much still focused on this set of exams and doing well. For many, they are struggling with "burn out" because they have worked part-time, participated in student organizations, been officers in some organizations, done pro bono work or other community activities, and taken some very hard required courses.
I suggest that these students talk to their employers about shortening their hours or not working at all over the two weeks of exams. Most employers understand that grades have to be a priority. I also suggest that these students schedule adequate breaks into their studying so that they can avoid being too tired to concentrate. Fortunately, most student organizations finished their end-of-the-year events last week.
The 1L students are often uncertain as to how they need to schedule their study time for this week and the two weeks of exams. I have been working on study schedules with many of them. In addition to group workshops where students build a schedule as we consider strategies, I work with students one-on-one as needed.
I encourage them to think about each day as having 3 potential study segments: morning, afternoon, and evening. I suggest alternative strategies for them to consider depending on their individual abilities to focus: one course per day; two courses per day; three courses per day. I also suggest that they choose an option for studying this last week of classes: alternate days for courses in the order of the exams; begin with the course in which they feel least prepared and then add in the other courses. Finally, we discuss the exam period itself and determine the days that need to be focused on one course and the days that need to be focused on two courses. We also talk about breaks after each exam before they return to studying for the next exam.
The relief on students' faces once they have a plan of attack for their own stressors tells me that planning pays off in a big way. Modifications may occur, but having an initial plan goes a long way to turning anxiety into action. (Amy Jarmon)
Friday, April 4, 2008
It is three weeks away from the end of classes at my law school. Most students are feeling the pressure right now. Many students are telling me that they are having the blahs, the blues, bouts of depression, or burdens of inferiority.
In short, it is time for me to help them regain perspective and become motivated for the final haul. (Obviously, the ones who need counseling are referred to our Student Wellness Center for additional assistance.)
Here are some ideas that I discuss with each student to help increase motivation and get perspective back.
- Remember the Chinese proverb that "You can eat an elephant one bite at a time." It is easy to get overwhelmed by the amount of material to learn in each course. Focusing on an entire course means you are looking at the elephant. Focusing on pieces of the course means taking the individual bites. A student gains control by listing the subtopics in a course, estimating the time needed to know each subtopic well, and laying out a study schedule for which subtopics will be done each day. As each subtopic is crossed off the list, the elephant is gobbled down.
- Think of exam study as covering two time periods. The first period includes the weeks remaining in classes when one keeps up with the usual tasks (reading, briefing, outlining each week) and carves out time to study for exams. The second period includes the actual reading and exam periods. By front-loading as much exam study as possible into each class week, you feel as though progress is being made toward the ultimate exams. Then, by planning the reading and exam period for the remaining tasks, you can focus on the final crunch.
- Have a three-track study system each week for both time periods. Read each course outline through cover to cover to keep all the material fresh. Focus on specific subtopics to learn them in depth for the exam. Finally, do practice questions on subtopics that have already been studied.
- Remember that you are the same unique, talented, bright, and special person that you were when you came to law school. If you have lost sight of this fact, it is time to ask a relative, friend, spouse, or other mentor to agree to become your "encourager" for the remaining weeks in the semester. Either telephone that person when you need a boost or have the person telephone you every day with words of encouragement.
- Use inspirational quotes, scriptures, or other sayings to motivate yourself. Whether you keep them in a binder that you read each morning and evening or post them around your apartment, these sources can inspire and encourage you to keep working hard.
- Visualize yourself making progress on your review for exams and taking the exam with confidence. An athlete visualizes success regularly before the actual swim meet or the actual pole vault at a new height.
- Do your best rather than trying to be perfect or an expert in a course. Law school is about learning to analyze areas of law that are new every semester. You cannot become an expert in every course in law school. You can only ask yourself to do your best each semester.
- Focus on the positive each day rather than the negative. By giving yourself credit for what you have accomplished rather than bemoaning what you should have done, you are more likely to move forward in your studying rather than stalling.
- Set up a reward system to motivate yourself for tasks. Set small rewards for small tasks (10-minute phone call, walk to the vending machine for a snack, playing 4 games of solitaire). Set medium rewards for medium tasks (half hour break; playing frisbee with the dog; reading a bedtime story to your child). Set large rewards for large tasks (dinner with friends; a movie; a long bubble bath).
In addition to discussions of study strategies, I find that I often give "pep talks" during this time of year. I praise students for what they are doing right in their study efforts. I encourage students who need to change some strategies to become more efficient and effective. And, I focus on managing the elephant's parts rather than being overwhelmed by the very large elephant in the room. (Amy Jarmon)
Wednesday, April 2, 2008
From the New York Times, Wednesday, April 2, 2008
Op-Ed Contributors: SANDRA AAMODT and SAM WANG,
Tighten Your Belt, Strengthen Your Mind
"On the other hand, if you need to study for a big exam, it might be
smart to let the housecleaning slide to conserve your willpower for the
more important job. Similarly, it can be counterproductive to work
toward multiple goals at the same time if your willpower cannot cover
all the efforts that are required. Concentrating your effort on one or
at most a few goals at a time increases the odds of success.
Focusing on success is important because willpower can grow in the long term. Like a muscle, willpower seems to become stronger with use."
(Rebecca Flanagan--I apologize--I keep forgetting to add my name!)
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
As the semester winds down and exam prep speeds up, I am working on a rubric for students to self-correct practice exams. I am developing the rubric for several reasons, the most pressing is time management. I
can't give feedback on practice exams for all the students that schedule time with me, so I need a tool to help them help themselves. A generic rubric that provides students with a guide to self-correcting exams needs to be broad but specific to law school exams, be easy to use and explicit where students needs help.
This is my work-in-progress template. I welcome any feedback, comments, or suggestions, as I know many of my fellow ASPer's have developed rubrics in the past. (RCF)
Is there a broad issue statement?
Does it mirror the call of the question?
Is the rule clearly and explicitly stated?
Is the rule broken into elements?
Are the elements correctly stated?
Is each element discussed sequentially?
Are all the elements discussed?
Is the element matched to relevant facts?
**Are cases used to compare and contrast facts and rules/elements?
**if relevant and appropriate for the question
Are all problematic facts discussed?
If no, list
Are any arguments dismissed without discussing both sides (pro/con, yes/no, applies/doesn’t apply)
Are relevant policy concerns discussed?
Does the analysis conclude?
Is the conclusion consistent with the analysis?
Each idea is in a new paragraph.
Sentences are clear and concise
(no run-on sentences)
Sentences are complete.
OVERALL EVALUATION AND SUGGESTIONS: