Wednesday, March 5, 2014
Is the check a negotiable instrument? Is the party a holder in due course? Was the check properly payable? These are frequent questions bar students draft as they struggle through answering Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Article 3 & 4 bar essays. However, these struggles appear to be over for many. According to the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE), effective with the February 2015 bar exam, Negotiable Instruments (Uniform Commercial Code Article 3 and the excerpts of Article 4, Bank Collections) will no longer be tested on the Multistate Essay Examination (MEE).
This news should come as a relief to future bar exam applicants and Academic Support Professors as well. UCC 3 & 4 is an area that students rarely study in law school. They approach bar review with little (if any) knowledge of negotiable instruments and bank deposits and collections. The unfamiliar language coupled with the lack of practicality make this area difficult for students to internalize. Some students may have never even written a check! Additionally, many states that do not use the MEE, no longer test UCC 3 & 4. Thus, the decision to remove UCC 3 & 4 from the list of subjects tested on the MEE seems timely and appropriate.
This news also made me wonder how decisions like this are made. For example, are there are other subjects that should also be eliminated from or added to the list of subjects tested on the MEE? What is the process by which these decisions are made? Additionally, NCBE has expressed interest in adding more subjects to the Multistate Bar Exam (MBE). Should all of the current MEE subjects also be tested on the MBE? Is this truly necessary for assessing competency? Or, is this a bar that will negatively impact access to the profession?